2006 4th International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks
DOI: 10.1109/wiopt.2006.1666484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-Managed Distributed Channel Selection Algorithm for WLANs

Abstract: Abstract-In this paper we consider the problem of a wireless LAN selecting a channel to minimise interference with other WLANs. We focus on interfering infrastructure-mode networks, where each access point (AP) or base station has a wired backhaul link. We introduce a new fully distributed and selfmanaged channel selection algorithm that does not require direct communication between APs nor explicit estimation of the network interference graph. The sole information required by the algorithm is feedback to each… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we propose a decentralised Learning MAC (L-MAC), which can be regarded as an evolution of L-BEB [2] incorporating ideas from the self-managed decentralised channel selection algorithm in [3]. The primary difference between L-MAC and L-BEB is that in L-BEB collisions cause memory to be lost of the current schedule.…”
Section: The L-mac Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we propose a decentralised Learning MAC (L-MAC), which can be regarded as an evolution of L-BEB [2] incorporating ideas from the self-managed decentralised channel selection algorithm in [3]. The primary difference between L-MAC and L-BEB is that in L-BEB collisions cause memory to be lost of the current schedule.…”
Section: The L-mac Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The channel assignment problem was initially addressed in the work of Kaufmann, Baccelli, Chaintreau, Papagiannaki, and Diot (2005) and more recently by Leith and Clifford (2006) and Mishra, Shrivastava, Agarwal, Banerjee and Ganguly (2006). These references consider the problem of interference in an 802.11 based infrastructure networks when collocated networks are owned by different entities and there is no wireless connectivity present between them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that this estimator appears to be somewhat less accurate than the idle/busy estimator, probably due to physical layer capture effects, but that it is nevertheless effective and practical. In future work we intend to use these estimators to support decision making in algorithms for channel allocation [1], rate adaptation [2], [4], carrier-sense adaption, etc.…”
Section: Convergence Rate Of Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%