A Self-Help Model for Working With Black Women of Alcoholic Parents

Brisbane, Frances Larry; Stuart, Bryan

doi:10.1300/j020v02n03_13

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the current empirical studies available on women's groups, there are vast differences in the populations explored. The populations included adult women (Graff, Whitehead, & LeCompte, 1986;Hodge, Stubbs, Gurgin, & Fredericks, 1998;Kauffman, Dore, & Nelson-Zlupko, 1995;Kees, 1999;Saxe & Johnson, 1999;Threadcraft & Wilcoxon, 1993), women of color (Brisbane & Stuart, 1985;Heilbron & Guttman, 2000;Mahtani & Huq, 1993), college-age women (Sullivan & Mahalik, 2000, Yahne & Long, 1988, high-risk mothers (Jarrett, Diamond, & El-Mohandes, 2001), mothers of children with special needs (Lovenfosse & Viney, 1999), widowed survivors of suicide (Constantino, Sekula, & Rubinstein, 2001), women who have experienced spousal abuse (Schlee, Heyman, & O'Leary, 1998), and older women (Burnside, 1993;Creanza & McWhirter, 1994;Johnson & Wilborn, 1991;McLeod & Ryan, 1993). It is interesting to note the range of populations being studied in the group setting from widowed survivors of suicide to African American women with alcoholic parents.…”

Section: From Which Specific Populations Were the Samples Drawn?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Six of the 26 studies (e.g., Burnside, 1993) reported using a convenience sample. Nine of the studies reported using existing groups of women (e.g., Brisbane & Stuart, 1985;Gilbert & Beidler, 2001;Rebeiro & Cook, 1999) or women who were referred into the study from their therapist or clinic (e.g., McLeod & Ryan, 1993;Saxe & Johnson, 1999;Schlee et al, 1998). Even these appeared to be mostly samples of convenience.…”

Section: What Sampling Procedures Were Used?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This quote indicates that groups with only women would foster more acceptance and participation from women. Brisbane and Stuart (1985) reported that women in the group recommended that the groups "remain race and sex specific . .…”

Section: What Findings Were Reported In the Articles?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Researching Women's Groups: Findings, Limitations, and Recommendations

Leech

Kees

2005

Journal of Counseling &Amp; Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There is not a "typical" women's group, nor are there "typical" women's issues. Every women's group is diverse, with as many viewpoints and perspectives as there are members in the group. Using the group format for women is common practice with many counselors. It is interesting that there has been little empirical research reported on women's groups, how women's groups function, or what useful techniques are used in successful women's groups. Indeed, there is a dearth of empirical research on women's groups. Although there are many articles available that describe women's groups with various populations and issues (e.g., Brody, 1996;Comas-Diaz, 1986;Tlakula, 1998) or discuss strategies for use with women in groups (e.g., Boudin, 1998;Green, 1991;Rife, 1997), there are very few articles written that report empirical research on the effectiveness of women's groups.There have been a handful of articles written that discuss this deficiency. In 1978, Nassi and Abramowitz located only nine published articles on women's groups. They concluded that this "relative paucity of research . . . does not appear to be merely the result of a normal time lag between social phenomenon and scholarly notice" (p. 154). They go on to state that this scarcity might exist from the "'masculine bias' that is embedded in all such institutions" (p. 155) and thus is embedded in research.Walker (1981) reviewed the literature and concluded that women's groups have a unique identity and are different in structure, process, and outcome from mixedgendered groups. Huston (1986) reviewed the literature on women's groups by critiquing Walker's conclusions and found that many of the articles that Walker cited as being based on empirical research studies were, in fact, not research based. Furthermore, many of the other research studies cited were found to have methodological problems. Huston concluded that "very little" (p. 289) can be concluded from the research. In addition, Huston stated, "feminists must move from presenting theory alone to validating their theoretical positions" (p. 290) by doing and reporting empirical research.Hoshmand (2003), in the recently published Handbook on Counseling Women, has declared a "sense of discovery about women as a relatively underresearched population" (p. 548). Hoshmand goes on to state that "there is an urgent need to develop research protocols that are both clinically and culturally sensitive" (p. 552). One of the major foci of the chapter is the importance of using qualitative inquiry and action research when researching women and women's issues. Based on this continued dearth of empirical research on women's groups, the purpose of this article is to report the current state of published research on women's groups and provide recommendations for future research in this area. MethodTo assess the current state of research on women's groups, a search of the literature was completed. Two major search engines (PsycINFO and ERIC) were used to find articles. With these search engines, the key words women and rese...

show abstract