1998
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1998.0400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-Help Intervention for African American Smokers: Tailoring Cancer Information Service Counseling for a Special Population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quit rates in both conditions were low, but consistent with the two previous randomized trials to-date with PLWH in which 6-month or longer outcomes yielded quit rates that ranged from 4% to 10% using different intervention approaches such as cell-phone counseling 20 and motivational interviewing. 20,22 Despite theoretical support and previous literature in the general population suggesting that tailored-counseling would yield better outcomes 17,[60][61][62][63] and that tailored videos and materials would better engage participants, 64,65 Aurora did not prove to have added benefit beyond that conferred by the ESC condition. Aurora consisted of significantly longer sessions and a greater number of in-person visits and calls, yet the increased intensity did not translate into better cessation outcomes in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Quit rates in both conditions were low, but consistent with the two previous randomized trials to-date with PLWH in which 6-month or longer outcomes yielded quit rates that ranged from 4% to 10% using different intervention approaches such as cell-phone counseling 20 and motivational interviewing. 20,22 Despite theoretical support and previous literature in the general population suggesting that tailored-counseling would yield better outcomes 17,[60][61][62][63] and that tailored videos and materials would better engage participants, 64,65 Aurora did not prove to have added benefit beyond that conferred by the ESC condition. Aurora consisted of significantly longer sessions and a greater number of in-person visits and calls, yet the increased intensity did not translate into better cessation outcomes in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, there are difficulties in comparing the quit rates among studies due to the differences in the definitions of quit rate, the target populations, and follow up periods (see appendix, table A1 (to view the appendix please visit the Tobacco Control website-http://www.tobaccocontrol.com/supplemental)). Although the US Clinical Practice Guidelines use the seven day point prevalence abstinence rate or continuous abstinence rate, calculated by intention-to-treat analysis with or without validation at five or more months follow up, as the main outcome measure in smoking cessation, 12 only the Quitlines of Western NewYork State 6 and California 5 and two other targeted Hotlines for young mothers 22 and African Americans 23 used such a definition. Moreover, the Western New York State and the California Quitlines included only motivated callers in the study and the targeted Hotlines recruited smokers through extensive media campaigns, thus limiting their comparability to other Quitlines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Australian Quitline 11 reported the continuous abstinence rate at six months (7.8%) without using intention-to-treat analysis. All other Quitlines targeted at the general smoking population [5][6][7][8][9][10][11] or specific population groups [22][23][24] reported 24 hour point prevalence quit rates or other quit rates (for example, one month or three month point prevalence quit rates). Only the Western New York State Quitline 6 reported biochemically validated quit rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Promising results have been found for a small number of studies using telephone counseling to extend effects of a school-based prevention program, 30 to promote requitting among smokers with recent unsuccessful quit attempts, 31 to support short-term abstinence among low-income women provided with free nicotine patches and proactive calls, 32 to promote short-term abstinence among smokeless tobacco users, 33 and as part of a tailored intervention for African American smokers. 34 Mixed results have been found for proactive calls to augment personalized written feedback, with a 12-month effect found for calls when combined with stage-tailored materials and expert system personalized feedback in the second of 2 trials by Prochaska et al 35,36 and higher short-term abstinence reported in a trial by Curry et al 37 Mixed results have also been found for proactive calls to support nicotine replacement use. No effect was reported by earlier trials, 38 -40 although promising results have been found in a more recent trial by Solomon and colleagues 32 and in preliminary data from our trials.…”
Section: Evidence Base: Proactive Telecounselingmentioning
confidence: 99%