2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00214-006-0112-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-consistent Reaction Field Model of Solvation Using Distributed Multipoles. II: Second Energy Derivatives and Application to Vibrational Spectra

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that the PCM model tends to overestimate the solvent effect at least regarding the changes in molecular vibrations. 20 Accordingly, we propose that the values in Ref. 13 are overestimated and apply a scaling factor of 0.75.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the PCM model tends to overestimate the solvent effect at least regarding the changes in molecular vibrations. 20 Accordingly, we propose that the values in Ref. 13 are overestimated and apply a scaling factor of 0.75.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 We will briefly restate the results of Im et al to introduce the approach extended here for use with the PMPB model. 20 The solvation free energy Δ G of a permanent charge distribution is (13) where q is a column vector of fractional charges, is the transpose of a column vector containing the electrostatic potential of the solvated system and is the corresponding vacuum potential. The number of components in each vector is equal to the number of grid points used to represent the system.…”
Section: B Lpbe Energies and Gradients For Fixed Partial Charge Forcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,9 In spite of the fact that the dipole moment of a polar solute can increase by 30% or more during transfer from gas to aqueous phase, empirical potentials have typically neglected explicit treatment of polarization for reasons of computational efficiency. However, ab initio implicit solvent models, including the Polarizable Continuum Model (PCM) introduced in 1981 by Miertus, Scrocco and Tomasi 10,11 , the Conductor-Like Screening Model (COSMO) of Klamt 12 , the distributed multipole approach of Rinaldi et al 13 and the SMx series of models introduced in the early 90s by Cramer and Truhlar 14 have long incorporated self-consistent reaction fields (SCRF). 10,15 These models allow the solute, described using a range of ab initio or semi-empirical levels of theory, and continuum solvent to relax self-consistently based on their mutual interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with calculations in weaker dielectrical surrounding (see Table I, Supplementary Material), the NCM–PCM electrostatic energies difference is inferior to 0.20 kcal · mol −1 in average [from α: 1.0 to 3.0] suggesting that both models are equivalent when identical solute cavity sizes are used. Moreover, D. Rinaldi et al 21 show that for a identical solute cavity volume, the equivalence NCM–PCM remains useful for reasonable dielectrical surroundings, i.e., the solvent used is acetonitrile (ϵ r of 36.6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to underline that only the electrostatic term is needed to get the wave function of the solute (nonelectrostatic contributions are considered as a corrective post‐treatment of the model). In NCM formalism 16–21, the Coulomb solute–solvent interactions energy is evaluated via a multicentric multipolar Taylor expansion of the electrostatic potential. This potential is called reaction potential, giving rise to a reaction field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%