2015 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision 2015
DOI: 10.1109/wacv.2015.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Self-Adjusting Approach to Change Detection Based on Background Word Consensus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
124
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SuBSENSE [26] .9500 (2) .8150 (3) .8180 (4) .6570 (5) .8990 (2) .8170 (2) .8260 (3) PAWCS [27] .9397 (4) .8137 (4) .8938 (2) .7764 (2) .8710 (3 Zivkovic [29] .768 (3) .704 (4) .632 (4) .620 (4) .300 (3) .321 (3) .820 (3) .829 (3) .748 (4) .638 (3) DP-GMM [23] . (6) .2075 (6) .9022 (5) .8700 (4) .646 (6) .6822 (5) .8169 (2) .6589 (4) .7480 (3) .6525 (6) [12] DP-GMM [23] .7876 (3) .7424 (5) .9298 (3) .8411 (5) .6665 (5) .6733 (6) .5675 (6) .6496 (5) .5522 (6) .7122 (5)…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SuBSENSE [26] .9500 (2) .8150 (3) .8180 (4) .6570 (5) .8990 (2) .8170 (2) .8260 (3) PAWCS [27] .9397 (4) .8137 (4) .8938 (2) .7764 (2) .8710 (3 Zivkovic [29] .768 (3) .704 (4) .632 (4) .620 (4) .300 (3) .321 (3) .820 (3) .829 (3) .748 (4) .638 (3) DP-GMM [23] . (6) .2075 (6) .9022 (5) .8700 (4) .646 (6) .6822 (5) .8169 (2) .6589 (4) .7480 (3) .6525 (6) [12] DP-GMM [23] .7876 (3) .7424 (5) .9298 (3) .8411 (5) .6665 (5) .6733 (6) .5675 (6) .6496 (5) .5522 (6) .7122 (5)…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, we have manually defined bounding boxes around moving objects and their shadows, to help discarding these areas for building the background models. The first half of images of the evaluation phase is used to estimate the global foreground models, using PAWCS [26] as an estimator. After this step, we perform the local feature/threshold selection.…”
Section: Description Of the Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We feed a background subtraction algorithm (named "estimator" in the remainder of the paper) with a sequence of training images including foreground objects. The choice of the estimator is not critical; state-of-the-art techniques, such as SuBSENSE [25] or PAWCS [26], are good candidates to segment foreground objects. Note that a fast estimator is not necessary because there is no real-time requirement during the training phase.…”
Section: Estimation Of the Foreground: Local Vs Global Foreground Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the complexity of dynamic scenes, most researchers have worked on developing sophisticated background models such as Gaussian mixture model [1], kernelbased density estimation [2] or codebook construction [3] (see [4], [5] for reviews on background subtraction). Other Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…authors have worked on other components such as postprocessing operations [6] or feedback loops to update model parameters ( [3], [7]). In contrast, the subtraction operation is rarely explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%