2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A self-adaptive deep learning method for automated eye laterality detection based on color fundus photography

Abstract: PurposeTo provide a self-adaptive deep learning (DL) method to automatically detect the eye laterality based on fundus images.MethodsA total of 18394 fundus images with real-world eye laterality labels were used for model development and internal validation. A separate dataset of 2000 fundus images with eye laterality labeled manually was used for external validation. A DL model was developed based on a fine-tuned Inception-V3 network with self-adaptive strategy. The area under receiver operator characteristic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, our DLS module achieved a sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI 89.7%–99.7%) and a specificity of 97.4% (95% CI 93.8%–100.0%) in eye laterality identification, which is similar to the performance of the algorithm for the fundus laterality detection 7 , 8 . Even for an experienced ophthalmologist, the accuracy of the eye side labeling is lower in the anterior segment images than labeling in the fundus images.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In this study, our DLS module achieved a sensitivity of 94.7% (95% CI 89.7%–99.7%) and a specificity of 97.4% (95% CI 93.8%–100.0%) in eye laterality identification, which is similar to the performance of the algorithm for the fundus laterality detection 7 , 8 . Even for an experienced ophthalmologist, the accuracy of the eye side labeling is lower in the anterior segment images than labeling in the fundus images.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Laterality ( right and left ) internal/external test performance was competitive when compared to previous DL based approaches ( AUROC : 1.000 18 , 0.995 20 , 0.989 25 , 0.976 22 , 0.920 19 , accuracy: 98.98% 21 , ≥ 98.6 23 , sensitivity : left 90.1% and right 91.6% 24 ) despite the laterality model classifying both multifield retinal images and non-retinal ( e.g., anterior eye ) images, whereas prior approaches focused on macula or nasal field images alone. However, the laterality model also had excellent classification performance when stratified by retinal field (Supplementary Table S5 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Second, we did not address torsion for the left eye or both eyes; however, others have successfully developed models that distinguished between images from the left and right eyes. 35 , 39 , 55 Automated screening for skews and fourth nerve palsies will be most useful when the fundi of both eyes are assessed and compared. Third, our holdout testing set was relatively small and not balanced for all classes (more extorsions than intorsions).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%