1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1951(99)00248-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A seismic velocity model for the SW Baltic Sea derived from BASIN'96 refraction seismic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed rheological study of the area (Marotta et al 1999(Marotta et al , 2000 supports the idea that the German Basin is stronger than the surrounding regions. This increase in the local strength is also consistent with other geophysical parameters: high lower crustal seismic velocities (Thybo 1990;Rabbel et al 1995;Bleibinhaus et al 1999) and high lower crustal density, as indicated by gravity modelling (Scheck et al 1999;Bayer et al 1999).…”
Section: R E S U L T Ssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A detailed rheological study of the area (Marotta et al 1999(Marotta et al , 2000 supports the idea that the German Basin is stronger than the surrounding regions. This increase in the local strength is also consistent with other geophysical parameters: high lower crustal seismic velocities (Thybo 1990;Rabbel et al 1995;Bleibinhaus et al 1999) and high lower crustal density, as indicated by gravity modelling (Scheck et al 1999;Bayer et al 1999).…”
Section: R E S U L T Ssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Besides deep crustal seismic refraction experiments [e.g., Aichroth et al , 1992; Schulze and Lück , 1992], only a few studies have investigated the internal sedimentary velocity structure in the central European basins so far. A velocity model along a seismic refraction profile near the I‐GET study area was derived for the SW Baltic Sea [ Bleibinhaus et al , 1999]. Using larger source and receiver spacing and a longer profile length than in I‐GET, the model extends over 200 km distance with a depth of penetration of 35 km, and the sedimentary part of the basin is resolved with less details in their models compared with the results from Groß Schönebeck.…”
Section: Interpretation and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suture between Baltica and Avalonia is at a relatively low angle and is thus capable of being imaged on normal-incidence reflection profiles (Krawczyk, Stiller & DEKORP-BASIN Research Group, 1999), and is not a vertical boundary as Berthelsen postulated. Furthermore, refraction seismic data of Bleibinhaus et al (1999) show a high-velocity layer in the lower crust beneath the northeast German mainland which is interpreted as evidence of a genetic relationship to Baltica crust. A wedge-shaped structure rather than a vertical boundary is also found in the receiver function analyses from the TOR data of Gossler et al (1999).…”
Section: C Geophysical Evidencementioning
confidence: 94%