Proceedings of Sixth International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition
DOI: 10.1109/icdar.2001.953905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A segmentation method for touching Japanese handwritten characters based on connecting condition of lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Th1 is set to 1.0 so that touching parts between adjacent characters can be cut. Although projection analysis is a very simple segmentation method, the result can still serve as a guidepost [2,3].…”
Section: Character Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Th1 is set to 1.0 so that touching parts between adjacent characters can be cut. Although projection analysis is a very simple segmentation method, the result can still serve as a guidepost [2,3].…”
Section: Character Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Sort the word candidate reliabilities based on new reliabilities obtained by (3). Figure 13 illustrates the combination process.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are two primary approaches to the segmentation of touching characters, recognition-free and recognition-based. Recognitionfree segmentation techniques use contour, skeleton and projection profile analysis [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and use only structural information. These empirical methods may efficiently address some touching problems but may not be robust enough to handle a lot of variation or uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They prune the touching-point candidates by projection analysis and select the appropriate ones based on the configurations around each candidate point. Some restrictions on the number of touching points are introduced to decrease the candidates [18]. However, these last two proposals are not combined with recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%