A Secure and Privacy-preserving Internet of Things Framework for Smart City

Witti, Moussa; Konstantas, Dimitri

doi:10.1145/3301551.3301607

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In most cases, architectures are harder to implement/adopt because they propose a solution for multiple parts or the whole system but often lack security details for specific parts. We discuss some representative examples of the papers we found that explicitly address, propose, or use security architectures such as Vithya Vijayalakshmi and Arockiam (2020), Witti and Konstantas (2018) and Pacheco et al (2018). Paper Vithya Vijayalakshmi and Arockiam (2020) discusses an architecture that protects the data security at all the layers of data flow, the transmission of data is essential in this contribution.…”

Section: Answering Rq22 How Well Do the Patterns And Architectures Co...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A decade of research on patterns and architectures for IoT security

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Security of the Internet of Things (IoT)-based Smart Systems involving sensors, actuators and distributed control loop is of paramount importance but very difficult to address. Security patterns consist of domain-independent time-proven security knowledge and expertise. How are they useful for developing secure IoT-based smart systems? Are there architectures that support IoT security? We aim to systematically review the research work published on patterns and architectures for IoT security (and privacy). Then, we want to provide an analysis on that research landscape to answer our research questions. We follow the well-known guidelines for conducting systematic literature reviews. From thousands of candidate papers initially found in our search process, we have systematically distinguished and analyzed thirty-six (36) papers that have been peer-reviewed and published around patterns and architectures for IoT security and privacy in the last decade (January 2010–December 2020). Our analysis shows that there is a rise in the number of publications tending to patterns and architectures for IoT security in the last three years. We have not seen any approach of applying systematically architectures and patterns together that can address security (and privacy) concerns not only at the architectural level, but also at the network or IoT devices level. We also explored how the research contributions in the primary studies handle the different issues from the OWASP Internet of Things (IoT) top ten vulnerabilities list. Finally, we discuss the current gaps in this research area and how to fill in the gaps for promoting the utilization of patterns for IoT security and privacy by design.

show abstract

Section: Answering Rq22 How Well Do the Patterns And Architectures Co...mentioning

confidence: 99%

A decade of research on patterns and architectures for IoT security

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…the ability of a network to absorb the performance degradation under some failure pattern (random or intentional) and to continue delivering messages with an increasing number of compromised nodes [45]. Another definition focusing on service continuation despite changes is given by Witti et al: Device resilience refers [to] the ability of a component to maintain service with alteration in the system environment [146]. Since IoT systems are systems that tend to evolve in larger scale and have considerable dynamics, complexity, and heterogeneity of involved components, these circumstances may be regarded in a resilience definition as well: Ratasich et al extend Laprie's definition and argue that resilience is a property which, in the context of IoT systems, should also scale dependability and security, e.g., when dealing with environmental or technological changes, which they refer to as long-term dependability and security [112].…”

Section: Avižienis Et Al Also Follow This View and Define Dependability Asmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey on Resilience in the IoT

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystems tend to grow both in scale and complexity, as they consist of a variety of heterogeneous devices that span over multiple architectural IoT layers (e.g., cloud, edge, sensors). Further, IoT systems increasingly demand the resilient operability of services, as they become part of critical infrastructures. This leads to a broad variety of research works that aim to increase the resilience of these systems. In this article, we create a systematization of knowledge about existing scientific efforts of making IoT systems resilient. In particular, we first discuss the taxonomy and classification of resilience and resilience mechanisms and subsequently survey state-of-the-art resilience mechanisms that have been proposed by research work and are applicable to IoT. As part of the survey, we also discuss questions that focus on the practical aspects of resilience, e.g., which constraints resilience mechanisms impose on developers when designing resilient systems by incorporating a specific mechanism into IoT systems.

show abstract

“…El concepto de ciudad inteligente se encuentra fundado en el uso de las nuevas tecnologías para el mejoramiento de los servicios tradicionales en entornos urbanos que debido a sus características económicas, políticas, sociales y ambientales; presentan condiciones complejas que dificultan su progreso y afecta su sostenibilidad [34], [35]. Estas tecnologías consisten en una infraestructura de sensores [36] encargados de la recolección inteligente de datos que al ser analizados y evaluados permitan la creación de estrategias que automaticen y optimicen los procesos urbanos [37], [38].…”

Section: Ciudad Inteligenteunclassified

“… Sostenibilidad  Rendimiento  Autonomía [28], [35], [37], [40] Usabilidad  Integración  Transparencia [34] Seguridad  Autenticación  Integridad de los datos  Privacidad [28], [34], [35], [37], [38] Mantenibilidad…”

Section: Eficiencia De Desempeñounclassified

Requerimientos no funcionales para sistemas basados en el Internet de las cosas (IoT): Una revisión

Ojo-Gonzalez

Bonilla-Morales

2021

I+D Tecnológico

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

El análisis de los requerimientos es una fase crucial que determina las funcionalidades y propiedades que debe poseer un sistema a desarrollar, realidad a la que no escapan los sistemas que involucran el paradigma del Internet de las cosas (IoT). Este paradigma permite incrementar los niveles de automatización y autonomía de los sistemas y servicios tradicionales, lo que lo ha llevado a ganar presencia rápidamente en diversidad de dominios de aplicación. En este documento se realiza una revisión literaria apoyada con la norma ISO/IEC 25010, para identificar los requerimientos no funcionales prioritarios para cuatro dominios de aplicación: ciudad, hogar, agricultura y fábricas inteligentes; señalando para cada uno los aspectos asociados y atendidos de acuerdo con las características de calidad del producto.

show abstract

A Secure and Privacy-preserving Internet of Things Framework for Smart City

Cited by 9 publications

References 14 publications

A decade of research on patterns and architectures for IoT security

A decade of research on patterns and architectures for IoT security

A Survey on Resilience in the IoT

Requerimientos no funcionales para sistemas basados en el Internet de las cosas (IoT): Una revisión

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About