A search-theoretic model of the term premium

Abstract

A consistent empirical feature of bond yields is that term premia are, on average, positive. The majority of theoretical explanations for this observation have viewed the term premia through the lens of the consumption based capital asset pricing model. In contrast, we harken to an older empirical literature that attributes the term premium to the idea that short maturity bonds are inherently more liquid. The goal of this paper is to provide a theoretical justification of this concept. To that end, we employ a monetary‐search model extended to include assets of different maturities. Short term assets mature in time to take advantage of random consumption opportunities. Long term assets cannot be used directly to purchase consumption, but agents may liquidate them in a secondary asset market characterized by search and bargaining frictions. Our model delivers three results that are consistent with empirical facts. First, long term assets have higher rates of return in steady state to compensate agents for their relative lack of liquidity. Second, since the difference in the yield of short and long term assets reflects asset market frictions, our model predicts a steeper yield curve for assets that trade in less liquid secondary markets. Third, our model predicts that freshly issued (“on‐the‐run”) assets will sell at higher prices than previously issued (“off‐the‐run”) assets that mature in nearby dates, because sellers of the latter have a more urgent need for liquidity.

Central Bank Purchases of Government Bonds

“…16 The parameters , , B, , and n can be set equal to their target values. That is, we set = 0:97 to replicate the real discount factor in the data, measured as the di¤erence between the AAA corporate bond rate and the in ‡ation rate, = 1:04.…”

Uncertainty-induced dynamic inefficiency and the optimal inflation rate

“…This could allow us to study how liquidity properties of such additional institutions as well as the optimal monetary policy interact with aggregate uncertainty, and potentially to help us understand many asset pricing anomalies. 6 Lastly, although not emphasized here, one could study dynamics and/or multiplicity in this framework. This dimension of research could potentially enrich types of multiple equilibria that the OLG model usually exhibits, e.g., Boldrin and Woodford (1990).…”

Scarce collateral, the term premium, and quantitative easing

“…For example, in this model currency can be dominated in rate of return by government debt and reserves because there are some DM meetings in which only currency is accepted in exchange. An approach that uses acceptability in exchange as an explanation for the term premium is the one constructed by Geromichalos et al (2013). Roughly, the idea is that the payoff on a maturing asset effectively becomes cash at not cost.…”