1960
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(60)90047-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A search for variations in the natural abundance of uranium-235

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

1961
1961
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The isotopic ratios varied slightly from the accepted natural levels, but were not significantly enriched or depleted. The variation of U isotopes reported in natural deposits [28,[34][35][36][37] is narrower than the range measured in our samples. Since the samples were acquired from a variety of sources, anthropogenic activities may have skewed the natural isotopic abundances from those found in ores and minerals.…”
Section: Major Uranium Isotopescontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…The isotopic ratios varied slightly from the accepted natural levels, but were not significantly enriched or depleted. The variation of U isotopes reported in natural deposits [28,[34][35][36][37] is narrower than the range measured in our samples. Since the samples were acquired from a variety of sources, anthropogenic activities may have skewed the natural isotopic abundances from those found in ores and minerals.…”
Section: Major Uranium Isotopescontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…7 to 1 by weight) (Rodgers and Adams, 1969). No statistically significant variations in the U-238/U-235 ratio have been found naturally except for several actinium-rich molybdenite and magnetite samples reported to contain excess U-235 (Hammer and Robbins, 1960;lsabaev et al, 1960;Cherdyntsev et al, 1961;Rosholt et al, 1963Rosholt et al, , 1964b and samples from the Gabon ore body in West Africa (Lancelot et al, 11975).…”
Section: Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%