1989
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(89)90059-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A search for photonless annihilation of orthopositronium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Atoyan et ai [11] performed a similar experiment that obtained an upper limit on the branching ratio of 580 ppm, their method necessitated applying a large background subtraction (20000 minus 20000 ppm), where a small change in background between the real and dummy targets could result in error. In contrast, here a thick hermetic photon detector is used to completely eliminate the background of the two escaping photons, hence enabling us to reach a sensitivity 200 times better than Atoyan et al We should then be able to conclude, without any ambiguity, whether the invisible decay or the conversion is the origin of the decay rate discrepancy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Atoyan et ai [11] performed a similar experiment that obtained an upper limit on the branching ratio of 580 ppm, their method necessitated applying a large background subtraction (20000 minus 20000 ppm), where a small change in background between the real and dummy targets could result in error. In contrast, here a thick hermetic photon detector is used to completely eliminate the background of the two escaping photons, hence enabling us to reach a sensitivity 200 times better than Atoyan et al We should then be able to conclude, without any ambiguity, whether the invisible decay or the conversion is the origin of the decay rate discrepancy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that the low energy emission (from radio to UV or, in some cases, X-rays) is generated via synchrotron radiation by relativistic electrons in the jet plasma, while high-energy emission (from X-ray to γ rays) is the result of inverse Compton scattering of seed photons by the same population of relativistic electrons. The seed photons could be either synchrotron photons generated in the jet (synchrotron selfCompton model; e.g., Atoyan & Nahapetian 1989;Marscher 2014) or ambient photons (external Compton model; Begelman & Sikora 1987;Tavecchio et al 2010). Several models have been proposed regarding the location of the γ-ray emission site relative to the central engine in blazars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first experiment on the o − P s → invisible decay, motivated by a puzzle in the o − P s decay rate (see below), was performed a long time ago [34], and then repeated with higher sensitivity [35]. The results exclude contributions to the o − P s decay rate from invisible decay modes (such as o − P s → νν, millicharged particles, etc..) at the level of Br(o − P s → invisible) < 3 · 10 −6 , but are not very sensitive to the o − P s → o − P s ′ oscillation mechanism because of the high collision rate in these experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%