2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2010.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A screened hydrogenic model with fine structure splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1. Nevertheless, in order to compare them with other model different to FAC, in Table 9 we show the transition energies for the ground state of Ni-like Xe compared with experimental data measured by Badnell et al [47] obtained from the paper of Smith [22]. The NRSHM shows good agreement with experimental data and with those obtained from Smith's model, having errors lower than 2.2%.…”
Section: Transition Energiesmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1. Nevertheless, in order to compare them with other model different to FAC, in Table 9 we show the transition energies for the ground state of Ni-like Xe compared with experimental data measured by Badnell et al [47] obtained from the paper of Smith [22]. The NRSHM shows good agreement with experimental data and with those obtained from Smith's model, having errors lower than 2.2%.…”
Section: Transition Energiesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…expressions (see appendices). We compare our results with the those obtained from FAC [30], GRASP [41], DFT DAVID code [38], and Smith's SHM model [22], As can be seen, theXa type values are closer to the calculations of DAVID code, while the HF type values agree better with GRASP. Thus, we can see that the differences among the numerical models is similar to that found between the NRSHM and any of them.…”
Section: Electron Binding Energiesmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The numerical values of the parameters determined by least-squares analysis are shown in Equations (12) through (17). The G 1 and F 2 values have units of a.u.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is not simple to determine unambiguously which set of screening constants is the best, we have investigated the impact of different sets (see Refs. [45][46][47]). The two latter depend on principal n and orbital ℓ quantum numbers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%