2013
DOI: 10.1111/apm.12081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DNA microarray for the versatile diagnosis of infectious diarrhea

Abstract: Several bacteria, viruses, and parasites cause diarrhea as coinfecting pathogens. We designed a DNA microarray comprising 60-bp probes spotted 194 times for the multiplex detection of 33 enteropathogenic bacteria and seven enteropathogenic viruses, and the archaeon Methanobrevibacter smithii was used as an internal positive control. Nine pathogen-free stool specimens were used as negative controls. One of these control specimens was further spiked with Salmonella enterica as a positive control. The microarray … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rapid and robust testing systems are needed for implementation on-site to inform rapid action. Other methods for detection and identification of Campylobacter have been published in recent years ( Velusamy et al, 2010 ), including antibody-based detection ( Wadl et al, 2009 ), PCR ( Josefsen et al, 2004 ; Leblanc-Maridor et al, 2011 ; de Boer et al, 2015 ), DNA microarrays ( Quinones et al, 2007 ; Donatin et al, 2013 ), and loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) ( Yamazaki et al, 2009 ; Dong et al, 2014 ; Sabike et al, 2016 ). Nevertheless, most procedures are still not fully adequate to be deployed on-site, as they involve specialized skills or facilities to perform certain steps such as DNA extraction or enrichment culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid and robust testing systems are needed for implementation on-site to inform rapid action. Other methods for detection and identification of Campylobacter have been published in recent years ( Velusamy et al, 2010 ), including antibody-based detection ( Wadl et al, 2009 ), PCR ( Josefsen et al, 2004 ; Leblanc-Maridor et al, 2011 ; de Boer et al, 2015 ), DNA microarrays ( Quinones et al, 2007 ; Donatin et al, 2013 ), and loop-mediated isothermal DNA amplification (LAMP) ( Yamazaki et al, 2009 ; Dong et al, 2014 ; Sabike et al, 2016 ). Nevertheless, most procedures are still not fully adequate to be deployed on-site, as they involve specialized skills or facilities to perform certain steps such as DNA extraction or enrichment culture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protocol here reported, combining lyophilization and a semi-automated DNA extraction, could be used for the routine detection of enteropathogen DNA in diarrheal stool specimens and the molecular diagnosis of infectious diarrhea [24]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research groups developed DNA microarray tests for the detection of enteropathogenic bacteria directly from human diarrheal stool samples as an alternative to traditional culture-based methods. Donatin et al [25] developed a DNA microarray for the detection of 33 enteropathogenic bacteria and 7 enteropathogenic viruses. Genomic DNA extracted from stool samples was fluorescence-labeled and hybridized on the microarray without prior amplification, but with a rather long hybridization time of 40 h. The microarray was tested with 40 pathological stool specimens, showing an overall specificity of 100% and an overall sensitivity of 97.5%.…”
Section: Infectious Diarrheamentioning
confidence: 99%