1997
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.50.10.801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scoring system for immunohistochemical staining: consensus report of the task force for basic research of the EORTC-GCCG. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
111
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
111
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When a semiquantitative measure (> 5%) was applied, the prognostic effect was not significant (P = 0.64), which is similar to other reports (Hunt et al, 1996). van Diest et al (1997) highlight the problems with scoring immunohistochemistry and suggest a protocol to reduce the variability between published papers. In this study, we have used only the defined staining pattern for each antibody, reviewed the complete tumour on the section stained and used a cut-off determined by clinical parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…When a semiquantitative measure (> 5%) was applied, the prognostic effect was not significant (P = 0.64), which is similar to other reports (Hunt et al, 1996). van Diest et al (1997) highlight the problems with scoring immunohistochemistry and suggest a protocol to reduce the variability between published papers. In this study, we have used only the defined staining pattern for each antibody, reviewed the complete tumour on the section stained and used a cut-off determined by clinical parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Within these 'hot spots' ten random chosen fields were analysed based on the guidelines from the Gynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (van Diest et al, 1997). The following parameters were measured: vessel counts, vessel perimeter and endothelial stained area.…”
Section: Digital Image Analysis and Immunohistochemical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5% cut-off was chosen because it conforms to the International European Organization for Research and Treatment of CancerGynaecological Cancer Cooperative Group recommendations (van Diest et al, 1997). Furthermore, this cut-off was used as the criterion to distinguish positive and negative immunohistochemical staining in our previous studies of prostate cancer (Cornford et al, 2000), thus ensuring consistency of criteria between studies.…”
Section: Patient Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%