2022
DOI: 10.1177/02692155221144554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scoping review to identify process and outcome measures used in acceptance and commitment therapy research, with adults with acquired neurological conditions

Abstract: Background Acceptance and Commitment Therapy interventions are increasing in use in neurological populations. There is a lack of information on the measures available. Purpose To identify and classify the measures used in Acceptance and Commitment Therapy research studies with adults with acquired neurological conditions. Methods PRISMA-ScR guided scoping review. MEDLINE, PsycInfo and CINAHL databases searched (up to date 29/06/2022) with forward and backward searching. All study types included. Extraction of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Online data collection appeared acceptable and feasible, although one participant required support to complete (taking 90 min), which may be unfeasible in a larger trial. Our choice of outcomes was informed by the literature 34 and PCPI. This small study was not powered to explore measurement outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online data collection appeared acceptable and feasible, although one participant required support to complete (taking 90 min), which may be unfeasible in a larger trial. Our choice of outcomes was informed by the literature 34 and PCPI. This small study was not powered to explore measurement outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online data collection appeared acceptable and feasible in this trial. Our choice of outcomes was informed by the literature [47] and PCPI. This small study was not powered to explore measurement outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%