2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scoping review of statistical approaches to the analysis of multiple health-related behaviours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
120
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
120
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this categorization does not allow for any distinction to be made between experimentation with a substance or activity and initiation of that behavior over a more sustained period of time. However, this dichotomization is necessary to identify if statistical significant clusters of behaviors are present using this particular method (McAloney et al, 2013). Due in part to relatively low proportions of participants reporting frequent participation in the behaviors in the current sample, particularly illicit drug use and sexual activity, more sophisticated methods of investigating the clustered nature of these risks, such as latent class analysis, were not undertaken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, this categorization does not allow for any distinction to be made between experimentation with a substance or activity and initiation of that behavior over a more sustained period of time. However, this dichotomization is necessary to identify if statistical significant clusters of behaviors are present using this particular method (McAloney et al, 2013). Due in part to relatively low proportions of participants reporting frequent participation in the behaviors in the current sample, particularly illicit drug use and sexual activity, more sophisticated methods of investigating the clustered nature of these risks, such as latent class analysis, were not undertaken.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was also evidence of some selective drop-out, by sex and SEP, which may limit generalizability of findings. We acknowledge alternative statistical approaches to the analysis of multiple behaviours and behavioural clustering [24], for example cluster analysis, but felt the current approach has greater public health relevance as it enabled us to characterize our sample relative to established public health guidelines rather than on the basis of within sample variability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding behavioural clustering, the co-occurrence of behaviours at a level that exceeds their combined individual prevalences [24], [25], is important because disease risk may increase synergistically when multiple risk factors occur simultaneously [26]. Moreover, the identification of populations that fail to meet guidelines for multiple health behaviours may enable appropriate targeting of intervention programmes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most comorbidity scores involve a count of health conditions, some including weights related to risk of outcomes such as mortality or hospitalization [11, 12]. However, these measures typically do not consider the severity of comorbidities in terms of their functional impact, which is of high relevance for patients with OA who already have a functionally limiting condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%