A Scoping Review of Qualitative Research Methods Used With People in Prison

Abstract

Researchers undertaking qualitative interview and focus group research with people in prison must consider the research methods they use, given the ethical and practical complexities of prison-based research. In particular, there are explicit and implicit coercion risks and barriers to access, privacy, and confidentiality. To examine how the challenges of conducting rigorous qualitative research with prisoners were handled, we undertook a scoping review of recruitment and data collection processes reported in qualitative research with prisoners. We searched for peer-reviewed articles of qualitative interview and focus group research with adult prisoners, published in the English language from 2005 to 2017, using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases. There were 142 articles reporting on 126 studies which met the review inclusion criteria. Challenges related to coercion risk, participant recruitment, sampling, confidentiality, privacy, and working with prison-based intermediaries should be explicitly addressed and reported. Our findings highlight key considerations and contextualized strategies for recruitment and data collection for researchers who seek to conduct rigorous and ethical qualitative research with prisoners.

Gendered punishment practices performed on female adolescents in their passage through the Uruguayan Juvenile Justice System

“…On the other hand, the political dimension, as discussed by Fassin (2016Fassin ( , 2018 regarding commitment inside the polis, is related to the goal of the research in terms of its application and the social effects of any kind of knowledge. Some of questions/debate have to do with ethical issues; how we access to enclosed institutions, how we use and consider the free and informed consent of the participants, how we characterize the encounters with the participants, how we write about them, knowing that in many contexts co-writing is difficult to implement in practice, and how confidentiality works and what it means (Freshwater et al 2012, Abbott et al 2018. The issue of confidentiality and anonymity becomes important when working in juvenile justice systems.…”

The Importance of Incorporating Lived Experience in Efforts to Reduce Australian Reincarceration Rates

“…Wynn and Israel (2018) highlighted that providing consent via written consent forms can turn collaborative relationships into a formality. Written consent forms may also present some challenges for protecting the confidentiality and privacy of people in prison (Abbott et al 2018). To mitigate this, some Australian human research ethics committees provide scripts for participants to give their verbal consent when written consent is not feasible or appropriate (see University of New South Wales n.d.).…”

Developing health and wellbeing in prisons: an analysis of prison inspection reports in Scotland

“…Many factors may help to maintain this status quo. Researchers studying prisons face multiple barriers to access and the prison service itself must manage diminishing resources including staff numbers [ 17 ].…”