Background: Early exposure to clinical settings for midwifery students could have a positive impact on anxiety levels, professional attitudes, and future job satisfaction. Failing to address these issues may increase the risk of clinical errors resulting in maternal or neonatal morbidity or mortality. The effectiveness of interventions that combine cognitive, affective, and psychomotor components in a blended virtual and face-to-face format is currently limited. To compare the effectiveness of blended multiphase, multidimensional peer-near versus preceptor models on midwifery students' anxiety, professional attitudes, and satisfaction.
Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2022 with 22 midwifery students from semester 1. They were randomly allocated either to the intervention group by peer students (n=11) or by professors (n=11). A three-phase blended virtual and face-to-face "childbirth pleasantness tour" intervention was conducted. Interventions comprised of two 2-hour virtual sessions covering midwifery regulations and ethics, psychoeducation, and narrative telling of previous experiences; two face-to-face practical simulation sessions at week 4; and presence in the delivery unit at the beginning of semester 2 for real clinical exposure, taking place at week 8. The primary outcomes of anxiety and professional attitude were evaluated using the Spielberger Anxiety Questionnaire and Agili's professional attitude questionnaire, respectively, at baseline, completion of the intervention in week 4, and follow-up in week 8. The secondary outcome of satisfaction was assessed using the Kirkpatrick Assessment in weeks 4 and 8.
Results: Anxiety decreased significantly at week 8 compared to the baseline in both peer-near (61.91 ± 3.59 vs. 53.27 ± 10.63, p = 0.007) and preceptor (65.09 ± 4.7 vs. 52.9 ± 8.1, p < 0.001) groups, respectively, without any significant difference between the two groups at either week 8 (p = 0.929) or the baseline (p = 0.90). A professional attitude significantly increased by Week 8 when compared to baseline in both peer-near (97.73 ± 8.94 vs. 88.09 ± 12.66, p = 0.029) and preceptor (65.09 ± 4.7 vs. 52.9 ± 8.1, p = 0.021) with significant differences in groups by Week 4. There was no significant difference in satisfaction observed for the time-group interaction (P=0.428).
Conclusions: Both interventions demonstrated similar effectiveness in reducing anxiety and improving professional attitudes when teaching knowledge and skills to students, whether conducted by peer or perceptor. This was due to their feasibility and attractiveness. These findings could be utilized in midwifery curricula to aid in the training of competent midwives capable of saving and serving the lives of mothers and babies.