2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2020.100605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scoping review: Facilitators and barriers of cervical cancer screening and early diagnosis of breast cancer in Sub-Saharan African health settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our cohort we found a low uptake of cervical cancer screening (44.9%), which has previously been demonstrated in Zambia [39]. This may reflect known barriers to cervical cancer screening such as limited health education and stigma [40]. Indeed, a 2016 cross-sectional study in Lusaka, Zambia found that only 36.8% of participants had heard of cervical cancer and only 20.7% of women had ever attended screening [41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…In our cohort we found a low uptake of cervical cancer screening (44.9%), which has previously been demonstrated in Zambia [39]. This may reflect known barriers to cervical cancer screening such as limited health education and stigma [40]. Indeed, a 2016 cross-sectional study in Lusaka, Zambia found that only 36.8% of participants had heard of cervical cancer and only 20.7% of women had ever attended screening [41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Previous studies in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMIC) have reported loss to follow‐up rates of 50%–60% among women with abnormal cervical cytology results 5,6 . Reasons for this attrition from care include structural problems such as lack of transportation, long waiting times at clinics, inability to take time off from work, and miscommunication concerning follow‐up visits, in addition to personal reasons such as fear and myths around cancer 5,7‐9 . High loss to follow‐up rates markedly reduce the effectiveness of cervical screening programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple articles have found similar barriers to screening as those highlighted in this scoping review. A study in Indonesia reported barriers to CCS including dislike of pelvic exams, discomfort of screening conducted by male HCPs, financial concerns, anxiety regarding abnormal results and the misconception that there is no need for screening when asymptomatic (Spagnoletti et al 2019). Pierz et al (2020 noted that in sub-Saharan Africa, barriers to CCS included lack of knowledge about BC and CC, lack of support from husbands, and the stigmatisation of the utilisation of CCS and BC screening services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%