2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1710-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scientometric analysis of mobile technology publications

Abstract: This paper focus on the growth and development of mobile technology research in terms of publication output as reflected in Web of Science database. During 2000-2013 a total of 10,638 publications were published in the field. The average number of publications published per year was 759.86 and the highest number of publications 1495 were published in 2013. Output of total publications, 9037 were produced by multiple authors and 1601 by single authors. Authors from USA have contributed maximum number of publica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The publication volume began to increase from 2012 to 2015, increased steadily from 2016 to 2018, exploded from 2019 to 2021, and reached 297 in 2021, with an average growth rate (AGR) of 15.22%. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of publications gradually decreased from 50.06% in 2013 to 36.91% in 2021 ( Santha Kumar and Kaliyaperumal, 2015 ), as seen both in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 . This indicates that though the yearly output is increasing year after year, the CAGR is in a downward trend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The publication volume began to increase from 2012 to 2015, increased steadily from 2016 to 2018, exploded from 2019 to 2021, and reached 297 in 2021, with an average growth rate (AGR) of 15.22%. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of publications gradually decreased from 50.06% in 2013 to 36.91% in 2021 ( Santha Kumar and Kaliyaperumal, 2015 ), as seen both in Supplementary Table S1 and Supplementary Figure S1 . This indicates that though the yearly output is increasing year after year, the CAGR is in a downward trend.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…As seen in Supplementary Table S2 and Supplementary Figure S2 , the relative growth rate (RGR) decreased from 2013 (86%) to 2021 (17%). There exists a direct equivalence between the relative growth rate and the doubling time ( Santha Kumar and Kaliyaperumal, 2015 ). The doubling time (DT) increases when calculated on an annual basis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authorship analysis was presented as the number of single-authored and multi-authored articles. Furthermore, the degree of collaboration was calculated according to the following formula: Degree of collaboration = C = Nm/Nm + Ns, where Nm = number of multi-authored papers and Ns = number of single-authored papers (Khaparde Professor & Pawar, 2013 ; Santha kumar & Kaliyaperumal, 2015 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual growth rate (AGR) was used, and calculated according to the following formula:where the ending value is the number of publications in the current period, and the beginning value is the number of publications in the period prior to the current period (Santha and Kaliyaperumal, 2015, p. 925; Shukla et al. , 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was calculated using the following formula:where the ending value is the cumulative value of the ending period, and the beginning value is the accumulated value of the beginning period (Santha and Kaliyaperumal, 2015, pp. 926–927; Shukla et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%