1998
DOI: 10.1542/peds.101.1.e1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A School-based Chlamydia Control Program Using DNA Amplification Technology

Abstract: (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One potential explanation for this finding is that urine LCR assays for CT have lower sensitivity than endocervical and urethral swab tests for CT, although the prevalence we found in sexually active female participants is still lower than the prevalences that other researchers have reported using the same urine-based technology. 2,4,7,8,20,24,25,28,35,37 Testing technology is not a likely explanation for the low prevalence we found in sexually active male adolescents, because urine LCR tests function as good or better than any other tests available for use with male patients. 28 We did not collect data to compare sexual behaviors among sexually active participating and nonparticipating groups and therefore cannot exclude the possibility that participants were at lower STD risk than nonparticipants because of factors such as number of partners and condom use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…One potential explanation for this finding is that urine LCR assays for CT have lower sensitivity than endocervical and urethral swab tests for CT, although the prevalence we found in sexually active female participants is still lower than the prevalences that other researchers have reported using the same urine-based technology. 2,4,7,8,20,24,25,28,35,37 Testing technology is not a likely explanation for the low prevalence we found in sexually active male adolescents, because urine LCR tests function as good or better than any other tests available for use with male patients. 28 We did not collect data to compare sexual behaviors among sexually active participating and nonparticipating groups and therefore cannot exclude the possibility that participants were at lower STD risk than nonparticipants because of factors such as number of partners and condom use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the U.S., 4.2% of young adults are infected [1], with prevalence rates of 5-25% being reported in sexually active teenagers [2,3]. Infection with genital serovars leads to complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and infertility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), including PCR, ligase chain reaction (LCR), strand displacement assay, and transcription-mediated amplification, are more sensitive for the diagnosis of C. trachomatis than culture, nonamplified DNA probe, and antigen detection tests and maintain relatively high specificity (1, 2). Equally important, the ability to perform NAAT on urine and self-collected vaginal swabs has expanded opportunities for screening men and women (7,10,11,14,21,26,28,29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%