1980
DOI: 10.1099/00222615-13-2-231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scheme for the identification of clinical isolates of gram-negative anaerobic bacilli by conventional bacteriological tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anaerobes were identified by colonial and cellular morphologies, antibiotic resistance test, dye tolerance test, biochemical test and sugar fermentation pattern described by Duerden et al (1980), Rotimi, Faulkner & Duerden (1980) and Willis (1977). Clostridium difficile was identified by Gram's stain reaction, characteristic smell and yellow colonies on CCFA medium that fluoresced under short-wave ultraviolet light.…”
Section: Identification Of Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anaerobes were identified by colonial and cellular morphologies, antibiotic resistance test, dye tolerance test, biochemical test and sugar fermentation pattern described by Duerden et al (1980), Rotimi, Faulkner & Duerden (1980) and Willis (1977). Clostridium difficile was identified by Gram's stain reaction, characteristic smell and yellow colonies on CCFA medium that fluoresced under short-wave ultraviolet light.…”
Section: Identification Of Isolatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taxonomy of the fusobacteria is still being debated (see Duerden et al, 1980) and our failure to demonstrate neuraminidase in any of the strains tested is unlikely to be of assistance. However, the results of our tests in Bacteroides species are consistent and conform with the latest classifications (Holdeman et al, 1977;Duerden et al, 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taxonomy of the fusobacteria is still being debated (see Duerden et al, 1980) and our failure to demonstrate neuraminidase in any of the strains tested is unlikely to be of assistance. However, the results of our tests in Bacteroides species are consistent and conform with the latest classifications (Holdeman et al, 1977;Duerden et al, 1980). They help to discriminate between several closely related species that are otherwise distinguished only by a small number of sugar fermentation reactions, e.g., between the species previously included in B. thetaiotaomicron, and between various species of the B. oralis-B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were identified by the methods of Duerden et al (1980). These strains comprised: one (A6) of F. necrophorum from a Roan antelope (Hippotragus equinus) with a subcutaneous abscess, two (A 24 and A 51) from wallabies with facial necrobacillosis, and one (A 42) from a wallaby with necrobacillosis of the leg and face; one (A 7) of B. oralis from a giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) with a purulent lesion of the face, and three (A 25, A30 and A44) from wallabies with facial necrobacillosis; one (A5) of B. bivius from a Roan antelope with a subcutaneous abscess, and two (A 27 and A49) from wallabies with facial necrobacillosis; two (A 17 and A46) of B. fragilis from wallabies with necrobacillosis of the spleen and stomach wall respectively; one (A22) of B. distasonis from a wallaby with a liver abscess; and one (A31) of B. thetaiotaomicron from a wallaby with a purulent infection of the foot.…”
Section: Organismsmentioning
confidence: 99%