2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26972-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scheme for Fingerphoto Recognition in Smartphones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, existing reviews lack a comprehensive discussion of current approaches. Notably, Malhotra et al [8], Mil'shtein and Pillai [9], and Labati et al [10] have explored various facets of touchless fingerprint recognition, providing valuable insights into mobile touchless recognition, comparative reviews, and a comprehensive overview of the entire recognition pipeline.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, existing reviews lack a comprehensive discussion of current approaches. Notably, Malhotra et al [8], Mil'shtein and Pillai [9], and Labati et al [10] have explored various facets of touchless fingerprint recognition, providing valuable insights into mobile touchless recognition, comparative reviews, and a comprehensive overview of the entire recognition pipeline.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under constrained capture conditions NFIQ2 is found to be an effective tool for touchless fingerprint quality estimation if an adequate preprocessing is applied. We will come back later to the topic of identification of individual from friction ridge skin images gathered from social media, but it is worth mentioning here that biometric systems are developed to handle verification using selfies taken from fingers [ 120 , 121 ].…”
Section: Friction Ridge Skin and Its Individualization Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2019, Labati et al discussed the finger photo recognition pipeline, including acquisition from a smartphone, liveness detection, quality assessment, segmentation, enhancement, feature extraction, and matching. The authors concluded that the two main reasons for the low performance of matching are due to heterogeneous smartphone acquisition, uncontrolled illumination, and background conditions' diversity [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%