Introduction: Although the NICE guidelines are clear in considering MRI as the gold standard for suspected scaphoid fracture, we noticed that there is a common practice of doing x-ray after two weeks. One of the reasons for that is the long waiting list till obtaining the MRI. The aim of our study is to illustrate the accuracy of this practice and to put an algorithm trying to make NICE guidelines more practical. Methods: In this retrospective study, we included135 acute trauma patients with suspected scaphoid fractures in St George's University Hospitals, London, UK, in the period between 01 /12 /2018 and 01/02/2019. Mechanism of injury, X-ray views and reports, CT and MRI reasons and results were recorded. All patients were followed by clinical examination and X-rays after six weeks from the injury. Results: Only 28 cases (20.7%) from the 135 cases included were proven to have scaphoid fractures (20 cases diagnosed from initial X-ray, two from X-rays after two weeks and 6 cases missed by both and diagnosed by CT and MRI). 69% of negative radiology initial reports recommend clinical reassessment and considering further imaging. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of X-ray after two weeks were 25%, 78.5%, and 74.4%. Conclusion: MRI is the gold standard for diagnosing scaphoid fractures and excluding other wrist pathology. We should discourage the currently common practice of repeating X-rays after two weeks due to its low sensitivity. Clinical examination after two weeks and considering further imaging, other than repeat X-ray, is the best practice if MRI is delayed.