1970
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90052-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scanning microscope with 5 Å resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) was already employed to make nano-scale measurements on biological samples in the 1970s [3] [4] and retains its importance today (for reviews see [5][6]). Key was the development of the field emission gun and its incorporation in the STEM [7]. This electron source delivers a highly coherent beam of electrons that can be focused to a spot less than 0.5 nm in diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) was already employed to make nano-scale measurements on biological samples in the 1970s [3] [4] and retains its importance today (for reviews see [5][6]). Key was the development of the field emission gun and its incorporation in the STEM [7]. This electron source delivers a highly coherent beam of electrons that can be focused to a spot less than 0.5 nm in diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of field emitters as potential electron sources for electron-beam instruments started around 1954 (Dyke & Dolan, 1956). The first practical utilization of such sources appeared late in 1968 as a part of a scanning electron microscope (Crewe et al, 1968(Crewe et al, ,1969Crewe & Wall, 1970). Many experimental FE studies have been carried out on tungsten, lanthanum hexaboride and carbon fiber emitters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our aim is to emulate and complement the achievements of scanning transmission electron microscopy (2), ultimately at comparable resolution, by taking advantage of the interaction properties of fast ions with matter (3). The latter include processes such as charge exchange and molecular ion dissociation which should result in contrast mechanisms unavailable to the electron microscope.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] From [2] we obtain an expression for the radius of the Gaussian image of the source in terms of probe current and specific brightness: rG = 1118 = (Io/3V)i/'(1/irac) [3] This contribution to the final spot size must be combined with those arising from diffraction and from spherical and chromatic aberration. As often done (9), we add these contributions in quadrature and seek the optimum value a0p, of as that reduces the overall probe radius r to its minimum value ropt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%