1982
DOI: 10.2334/josnusd1959.24.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scanning electron microscopic observation of detached dental calculus on cementum surface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…was not perfect but seemed to be similar to monoclinic brushite, CaHPO4.2H20, rather than hexagonal hydroxyapatite, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, which usually have the form of hexagonal plates or pi isms [4,5,6,7], although the X-ray diffraction method failed to detect it because of the scarcity of the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was not perfect but seemed to be similar to monoclinic brushite, CaHPO4.2H20, rather than hexagonal hydroxyapatite, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2, which usually have the form of hexagonal plates or pi isms [4,5,6,7], although the X-ray diffraction method failed to detect it because of the scarcity of the material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%