2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2890031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scaling method to enhance detection of a nonlinear elastic response

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inNonlinear ultrasonic measurements with EMATs for detecting pre-cracking fatigue damage AIP Conf.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NEWS with TR procedure has been recognized as a useful tool for non-destructive testing (cracks detection) of various solid materials, such as complex composites. During the pioneering work in bubbly liquids [15], efficiency of TR-NEWS methods have been numerically demonstrated [30] and extended [31][32][33] in complex structure for crack identification and detection.…”
Section: Nonlinear Time Reversal Acoustics (Nl-tra)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NEWS with TR procedure has been recognized as a useful tool for non-destructive testing (cracks detection) of various solid materials, such as complex composites. During the pioneering work in bubbly liquids [15], efficiency of TR-NEWS methods have been numerically demonstrated [30] and extended [31][32][33] in complex structure for crack identification and detection.…”
Section: Nonlinear Time Reversal Acoustics (Nl-tra)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, results from a traditional wave spectroscopy analysis (Van den Abeele et al, 2000;CamposPozuelo et al, 2006;Goursolle et al, 2008) may be biased by the low amplitude of the higher order harmonics (or sub-harmonics) generated (Antonaci et al, 2010), which are frequently submerged within the noise level. As an alternative, we have recently proposed a scaling subtraction method (SSM) (Scalerandi et al, 2008a; et al, 2009) which allows to detect the influence of the nonlinearity of the sample on the portion of the signal at the fundamental frequency, with benefits in terms of signal-to-noise ratio. We have shown elsewhere the sensitivity of the method both to the presence of nonlinearity (Scalerandi et al, 2008b) and to its evolution (Bruno et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the one recorded from the receiver).More details about the procedure can be found inScalerandi et al (2008a) andBruno et al (2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A frequency domain version 9 of the Scaling Subtraction Method (SSM) 13 is conducted to quantify the amount of nonlinearity present between the low and high amplitude focal signals. A Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) is performed on both the low and high amplitude focal signals.…”
Section: Experiments Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%