2015
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scaling law for the lift of hovering insects

Abstract: Insect hovering is one of the most fascinating acrobatic flight modes in nature, and its aerodynamics has been intensively studied, mainly through computational approaches. While the numerical analyses have revealed detailed vortical structures around flapping wings and resulting forces for specific hovering conditions, theoretical understanding of a simple unified mechanism enabling the insects to be airborne is still incomplete. Here, we construct a scaling law for the lift of hovering insects through relati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the LEV is an essential unsteady mechanism for lift production in autorotation [7], we followed a similar reasoning and constructed here a corresponding scaling for animal wings during autorotation. We found that inclusion of the Strouhal number, aspect ratio, and offset of the rotational axis relative to the wing base fits the previously derived law (see Lee et al [12]; figure 6). This similarity in the scaling of lift production in hovering flight and during wing autorotation for small animal fliers deserves further experimental attention, and particularly characterization of the LEV using particle image velocimetry or computational fluid dynamics.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because the LEV is an essential unsteady mechanism for lift production in autorotation [7], we followed a similar reasoning and constructed here a corresponding scaling for animal wings during autorotation. We found that inclusion of the Strouhal number, aspect ratio, and offset of the rotational axis relative to the wing base fits the previously derived law (see Lee et al [12]; figure 6). This similarity in the scaling of lift production in hovering flight and during wing autorotation for small animal fliers deserves further experimental attention, and particularly characterization of the LEV using particle image velocimetry or computational fluid dynamics.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…For the sake of accuracy, the exact fitting (superimposed in figure 5) results to be W ¼ 0:078807St À0:91455 , with a linear regression coefficient R 2 ¼ 0.527, considering seeds data for statistics in order to have a general trend. To identify simple relationships among the dimensionless parameters in equation (4.9), we use a recent scaling law in [12] that predicts that the aerodynamic force F perpendicular to the wing surface behaves as…”
Section: ð4:3þmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is more useful to know the two-dimensional (2D) coefficient (C trans l ) for the wing airfoil that can be used directly in the BEM. Conventionally, the translational velocity at the radius of gyration is taken as the reference to calculate the aerodynamic forces for the entire flapping wings [e.g., Harbig et al, 2014;Lee et al, 2015;Percin & van Oudheusden, 2015]. In this case, the same resultant translational lift can be obtained by BEM with C trans l which takes the value of C trans L , as shown in Appendix A.…”
Section: Translation-induced Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%