2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scale for the Management of Aggressive and Violent Behaviour (C_MAVAS): Psychometric Properties Testing in Mental Health Nurses

Abstract: Background: This study set out to examine the psychometric properties of C_MAVAS, a newly Chinese-translated version of MAVAS, a 27-item scale assessing healthcare professionals’ attitudes to the management of patient violence. Method: The English version of the MAVAS was translated and back-translated to come up with C_MAVAS. A convenience sample of 262 qualified mental health nurses working in a local psychiatric hospital was recruited. Exploratory factor analysis tested C_MAVAS’s construct validity. Results… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The POAS and MAVAS are widely used (Cheung et al, 2018). In particular, the POAS might not be affected by psychosocial issues associated with general health and mental disorders, including personality disorders (Muro et al, 2002; Needham et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The POAS and MAVAS are widely used (Cheung et al, 2018). In particular, the POAS might not be affected by psychosocial issues associated with general health and mental disorders, including personality disorders (Muro et al, 2002; Needham et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A higher score indicates a more positive view and higher tolerance towards patient aggression. Attitude was assessed by using the validated Chinese version of the management of aggression and violence attitude scale (MAVAS), which comprised 27 items [ 70 , 71 ]. The MAVAS was scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest risk is reported in an emergency, and mental health areas (e.g., Pich et al, 2017), but nurses are commonly exposed to patient aggression in medical-surgical areas and community settings as well (e.g., Shi et al, 2017;Williamson et al, 2014). In recent decades, the issue of patient aggression has attracted more attention internationally (Cheung et al, 2018) due to an emerging need to understand this phenomenon comprehensively and due to the escalation of violence in society. The impact of this risky issue is widespread, thus necessitating research focused on severe, undesirable consequences on patients, the organization, and nurses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They do not explicitly measure the factors affecting patient aggression against nurses nor the meaning assigned to them by nurses in terms of their potential to increase the risk of patient aggression against nurses. Furthermore, most of these instruments are suitable for specific care areas (e.g., psychiatric wards) and internationally, there are a lack of comprehensive tools designed for all types of care units (Cheung et al, 2018). Identifying this gap, we decided to construct a new scale to map these factors from the nurses' perspectivethe Factors Affecting Patient Aggression Scale (the FAPAS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%