2018
DOI: 10.1101/245738
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A scalable method to improve gray matter segmentation at ultra high field MRI

Abstract: High-resolution (functional) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at ultra high magnetic fields (7 Tesla and above) enables researchers to study how anatomical and functional properties change within the cortical ribbon, along surfaces and across cortical depths. These studies require an accurate delineation of the gray matter ribbon, which often suffers from inclusion of blood vessels, dura mater and other non-brain tissue. Residual segmentation errors are commonly corrected by browsing the data slice-by-slice an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, manual segmentation protocols (Wenger et al, 2014;Berron et al, 2017), although time consuming (Zhan et al, 2018;Koizumi et al, 2019), are still a common practise for 7T data. To partially reduce the laboursome process of manual segmentation, the solution proposed by Gulban et al (2018) combines manual and semi-automatic segmentation, by adopting a multi-dimensional transfer function to single out non-brain tissue voxels in 7T MRI data of nine volunteers. Other semi-automated methods developed in the past for generic MRI data, such as ITK-SNAP (Yushkevich et al, 2006), have been adapted by (Archila-Meléndez et al, 2018) for tackling also ultra-high field brain imaging.…”
Section: Existing Methods For 7t Brain Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, manual segmentation protocols (Wenger et al, 2014;Berron et al, 2017), although time consuming (Zhan et al, 2018;Koizumi et al, 2019), are still a common practise for 7T data. To partially reduce the laboursome process of manual segmentation, the solution proposed by Gulban et al (2018) combines manual and semi-automatic segmentation, by adopting a multi-dimensional transfer function to single out non-brain tissue voxels in 7T MRI data of nine volunteers. Other semi-automated methods developed in the past for generic MRI data, such as ITK-SNAP (Yushkevich et al, 2006), have been adapted by (Archila-Meléndez et al, 2018) for tackling also ultra-high field brain imaging.…”
Section: Existing Methods For 7t Brain Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method, which includes a non-trivial preprocessing chain for skull stripping and dura estimation, achieves whole brain segmentation and cortical extraction, all within a computation time below six hours. Despite these efforts, most existing solutions, including Bazin et al (2014), still generate a variety of segmentation errors that needs to be manually addressed, as reported in Gulban et al (2018).…”
Section: Existing Methods For 7t Brain Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E.g. the interested reader is referred to an instruction of how to use FreeSurfer, nighres and SUMA to generate an input rim file for LayNii here: (https://layerfmri.com/getting-layers-in-epi-space/), this segmentation can be further corrected with the semi-manual segmentation tool Segmentator (Gulban et al 2018) (https: //github.com/ofgulban/segmentator).…”
Section: What Laynii Does Not Containmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have implemented the methods described here in a free and open Python software package . The package as well as validation data, corresponding expert segmentations (Gulban, Schneider, Marquardt, Haast, & De Martino, 2017), and processing scripts used to validate the proposed methods are all openly available (see Table 2.1 for links).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%