2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10922-021-09618-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scalable Hierarchically Distributed Architecture for Next-Generation Applications

Abstract: The rigidity of traditional network architectures, with tightly coupled control and data planes, impairs their ability to adapt to highly dynamic requirements of future application domains. While Software-Defined Networking (SDN) can provide the required dynamism, it suffers from scalability issues. Therefore, efforts have been made to propose alternative decentralized solutions, such as the flat distributed SDN architecture. Such alternatives address the scalability problem for mainly local flows, but are imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence it is crucial to examine to what extent the network monitoring should be delegated to a single controller. Hierarchical SDN architectures were proposed as a possible solution to address this issue where the control plane is built from multiple layers of controllers and the load is shared between these layers (Ravuri et al, 2022). However, this solution suffers from the problem of the "synchronization between the controllers" and it is still an open research question that needs to be investigated (Zhang et al, 2019a;Domeke et al, 2022).…”
Section: Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence it is crucial to examine to what extent the network monitoring should be delegated to a single controller. Hierarchical SDN architectures were proposed as a possible solution to address this issue where the control plane is built from multiple layers of controllers and the load is shared between these layers (Ravuri et al, 2022). However, this solution suffers from the problem of the "synchronization between the controllers" and it is still an open research question that needs to be investigated (Zhang et al, 2019a;Domeke et al, 2022).…”
Section: Scalabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (4) shows that the end node of the previous hop is equal to the start node of the next hop of the k th service originating from the source node s for any intermediate node m, where the number of services flowing into or out of m is the same to ensure the routed path is continuous.…”
Section: Path-related Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To satisfy the computing demands of intelligent services, computing is gradually moving from the cloud to the edge [ 3 , 4 ]. End computing has emerged based on mobile and IoT devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Networking architectures are undergoing a transformation to cope with such requirements, where efforts are being made to offer solutions on several layers of the network stack. There are a range of solutions offered on the network layer, such as software-defined networking (SDN) [3], service chaining [4], and network slicing [5]. However, while such solutions offer resources on the network layer, they are not optimized to deal with the dynamic packet loss ratios experienced by future wireless networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%