1999
DOI: 10.1515/ijsl.1999.137.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Scaffolding for language policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the Estonian Department of Statistics, there are more than 120 ethnic groups living in Estonia (but only 15 of them exceed 1000 members), but less than 40% of them have retained their ethnic languages, with most of them having shifted to Russian, many already during the Soviet period (see more in Siiner 2006). In Lamberts' terms, Estonia and Tallinn can thus be described as dyadic rather than mosaic in terms of presence of different linguistic groups (Russian and Estonian) (Lambert 1999).…”
Section: Tallinnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Estonian Department of Statistics, there are more than 120 ethnic groups living in Estonia (but only 15 of them exceed 1000 members), but less than 40% of them have retained their ethnic languages, with most of them having shifted to Russian, many already during the Soviet period (see more in Siiner 2006). In Lamberts' terms, Estonia and Tallinn can thus be described as dyadic rather than mosaic in terms of presence of different linguistic groups (Russian and Estonian) (Lambert 1999).…”
Section: Tallinnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was the main language until the establishment of Israel, when because of changing political circumstances it became a secondary language. Despite Arabic being the second official language it is not a competing partner in a dyadic bilingual state according to the classification by Lambert (1999)." In the current work we consciously choose not to delve into the history and politics of the linguistic communities within Israel as it is beyond the scope of this work, instead we focus on language practices and more specifically, the aim is to investigate the attitude of a small number of adult Israeli-Arabs toward their parents'-led FLP as well as their own early FLP planning.…”
Section: International Journal Of Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on the sociolinguistic domains proposed by Fishman, Cooper, and Ma (1971), Spolsky (2004) lists areas of inquiry including families, schools, religious organizations, workplace, local government, nation states, and supranational groups. Within the school, language policy addresses such issues as how the native language (Ll) is instructed; what policies are provided for English language learners and minority language speakers; what world languages should be used or taught; and how much, when, how, and to what ends the languages should be taught (Corson, 1999;Lambert, 1994Lambert, , 1999Reagan & Osborn, 2002). Yet, there is little theory of language choice in foreign language policy in general (Lambert, 2001).…”
Section: World Language Education and Language Policy: Trends And Issmentioning
confidence: 99%