2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-0857-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A saprobic index for biological assessment of river water quality in Brazil (Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro states)

Abstract: Based upon several years of experience in investigations with macrozoobenthos in rivers in the states of Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro, a biological assessment system has been developed to indicate pollution levels caused by easily degradable organic substances from sewers. The biotic index presented here is aimed at determining water's saprobic levels and was, therefore, named the "Saprobic Index for Brazilian Rivers in Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro states" (ISMR). For this purpose, saprobic valences and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
1
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment of biomonitoring protocols has been conducted in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, and Ecuador, with most studies applying slightly modified versions of biotic indices generated in Europe, such as the BMWP and/or Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT or BMWP/taxon richness) index to detect impairment (e.g., Jacobsen 1998;Tarras-Wahlberg et al 2001). Other studies have adapted and tested biotic indices (e.g., Capítulo et al 2001;Mugnai et al 2008;Junqueira et al 2010), multimetric indices (Weigel et al 2002;Baptista et al 2007;Ferreira et al 2011;Oliveira et al 2011b), multivariate models (Moreno et al 2009), and predictive multimetric models (Moya et al 2011) for basin or regional use.…”
Section: Developing Large-scale Biomonitoring Programs Elsewhere-latimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessment of biomonitoring protocols has been conducted in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Bolivia, and Ecuador, with most studies applying slightly modified versions of biotic indices generated in Europe, such as the BMWP and/or Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT or BMWP/taxon richness) index to detect impairment (e.g., Jacobsen 1998;Tarras-Wahlberg et al 2001). Other studies have adapted and tested biotic indices (e.g., Capítulo et al 2001;Mugnai et al 2008;Junqueira et al 2010), multimetric indices (Weigel et al 2002;Baptista et al 2007;Ferreira et al 2011;Oliveira et al 2011b), multivariate models (Moreno et al 2009), and predictive multimetric models (Moya et al 2011) for basin or regional use.…”
Section: Developing Large-scale Biomonitoring Programs Elsewhere-latimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saprobic indices, developed using protozoans, phytoplankton, and rotifers have been extensively used to evaluate the water quality in lentic and lotic systems (Junqueira, Friedrich, & Pereira de Araujo, ). Rotifers are particularly useful in this regard because they are easy to recognize even when preserved and are sensitive to many pollutants (Sarma & Nandini, ; Snell & Joaquim‐Justo, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these approaches indicate the general pollution level of the water, especially saprobity. Each species of aquatic organism is characteristic of different intensities of organic matter load and levels of self-purification in water courses (Junqueira et al 2010). The saprobity system is based on observations of rivers that have received a heavy load of sewage and that show distinct zones of decreasing pollution.…”
Section: Data Collection and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%