2019
DOI: 10.1166/mex.2019.1524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor using polythionine/AuNPs nanocomposites as label for ultrasensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen

Abstract: A sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor was developed in this study for sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) based on rGO/CS/AuNPs as a sensing platform and PTh-Au composites as signal labels. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO), Chitosan (CS) and AuNPs were layer by layer modified on glass carbon electrode (GCE), which effectively enhanced electron transfer and provided excellent large electrochemical active surface area. Polythionine-Au composites prepared by chemical reduction method greatly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Te regression equation was I P (μA) � 4.6652 + 0.7570x (R 2 � 0.9981) with 0.35 pg•mL −1 detection limit. In comparison with other nanoprobe-based immunosensors [31][32][33][34][35][36][37], the detection limit of the prepared immunosensor was lower (Table 1). Te reasons for the excellent analytical performance of the designed immunosensor may be summarized as follows: frst, PANI, as the conductive shell of PB@PANI core-shell structure, maintained the structural stability of PB and efectively improved the electron transfer from PANI to PB due to the intimate adhesion.…”
Section: Quantitative Detection Of Ceamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Te regression equation was I P (μA) � 4.6652 + 0.7570x (R 2 � 0.9981) with 0.35 pg•mL −1 detection limit. In comparison with other nanoprobe-based immunosensors [31][32][33][34][35][36][37], the detection limit of the prepared immunosensor was lower (Table 1). Te reasons for the excellent analytical performance of the designed immunosensor may be summarized as follows: frst, PANI, as the conductive shell of PB@PANI core-shell structure, maintained the structural stability of PB and efectively improved the electron transfer from PANI to PB due to the intimate adhesion.…”
Section: Quantitative Detection Of Ceamentioning
confidence: 82%
“…no. Type of sensor Sensing material Target Bio marker Lowest measured concentration References 1 ELISA CEA, CYFRA-21 ~ng/mL 19 2 Electrochemical immunosensor Cubic CeO2 implanted reduced graphene oxide based biosensor CYFRA 21-1 0.625 pg /mL 43 3 Electrochemical immunosensor Polyhydroquinone-graphene composite CYFRA-21 2.3 pg/mL 44 4 Electrochemical immunosensor Amine-functionalized MoO3@RGO Nanohybrid-Based Biosensor CEA 0.001 ng/mL 45 5 Electrochemical immunosensor A sandwich-type electrochemical immunosensor using polythionine/AuNPs nanocomposites CEA 0.3 ng/mL 46 6 This work RGO/MEL/antibody/BSA/antigen CEA, CYFRA-21 1 pg/mLfor both the antigens …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, graphene and carbon nanotubes are probably the most commonly used materials in chemical analysis. These carbon nanomaterials can be synthesized by several methods, which can be roughly classified in top-down and bottom-up methods (Lai et al 2019 ). Their physicochemical characterization is essential to assure product quality (purity, defects, chemical species on the surface, etc.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%