1988
DOI: 10.1177/002224298805200205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rules-Based Approach to Competitive Interaction

Abstract: The authors analyze competitive interaction in terms of its underlying rules. They argue that rules coordinate competitive activity and that a rule-theoretic approach allows the interpretation and prediction of competitive moves and countermoves. Emphasis is placed on the ongoing negotiation of rules during the competitive interaction process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One could argue that these organizations are structurally equivalent." This assertion is supported by a broad base of literature that suggests that in many industries, horizontally related firms have access to similar types of information because of common structural linkages through trade associations (Vives 1990), industry-based norms and procedures (Thomas and Soldow 1988), networks of informal knowhow trading (von Hippel 1987), and membership in a common technological community (Powell, Koput, and Smith-Doerr 1996). Not all horizontally related firms share high levels of redundant knowledge.…”
Section: Tie Strength and Alliance Compositionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One could argue that these organizations are structurally equivalent." This assertion is supported by a broad base of literature that suggests that in many industries, horizontally related firms have access to similar types of information because of common structural linkages through trade associations (Vives 1990), industry-based norms and procedures (Thomas and Soldow 1988), networks of informal knowhow trading (von Hippel 1987), and membership in a common technological community (Powell, Koput, and Smith-Doerr 1996). Not all horizontally related firms share high levels of redundant knowledge.…”
Section: Tie Strength and Alliance Compositionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Rule-based fairness, advocated by Thomas and Soldow (1988), further shows that all marketing exchanges are subject to some rules. With the passage of time, these rules get established in practice and act to regulate the behaviour of the parties involved.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived violation of the implicit right to respect. A seller’s attitude that does not conform to the rules governing the dyadic relation between buyers and sellers (Thomas and Soldow, 1988), particularly regarding monetary compensation, may be perceived by consumers as a form of non-respect for their status as exchange partners (Maxwell, 2002). In addition to the rules, the notion of respect is inherent to the procedures used by the firm (procedural fairness) and/or to how these procedures are implemented by the employees (interactional fairness) (Ashworth and McShane, 2012).…”
Section: The Ethics Of Odpmentioning
confidence: 99%