2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88808-6_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rule-Based Notation to Specify Executable Electronic Contracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of rule-based norm operationalisation has already been explored in previous research. Some approaches [13,15] directly define the operationalisation of the norms as rules of a specific language, not allowing enough abstraction to define norms at a high level to be operationalised in different rule engine specifications. [5] introduces a translation scheme, but it is bound to Jess by using specific constructs of this language and it does not support constitutive norms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of rule-based norm operationalisation has already been explored in previous research. Some approaches [13,15] directly define the operationalisation of the norms as rules of a specific language, not allowing enough abstraction to define norms at a high level to be operationalised in different rule engine specifications. [5] introduces a translation scheme, but it is bound to Jess by using specific constructs of this language and it does not support constitutive norms.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically relating to business to business agreements and contracts, Strano [18] has built on previously mentioned work regarding electronically modelling business contracts [3]. More recent work provides a vocabulary for modelling contracts in terms of sets of events, obligations, rights and prohibitions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1. The actual rules are presented next, using the notation developed in [9]. We assume that they have been validated for consistency and that potential conflicts are solved by conventional prioritisation mechanisms.…”
Section: Examples Of Rules With Exception Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%