2018
DOI: 10.1080/22797254.2018.1455540
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rule-based approach for crop identification using multi-temporal and multi-sensor phenological metrics

Abstract: Accurate classification and mapping of crops is essential for supporting sustainable land management. Such maps can be created based on satellite remote sensing; however, the selection of input data and optimal classifier algorithm still needs to be addressed especially for areas where field data is scarce. We exploited the intra-annual variation of temporal signatures of remotely sensed observations and used prior knowledge of crop calendars for the development of a two-step processing chain for crop classifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(43 reference statements)
8
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to avoid overfitting, an L2 regularization was used with regularization coefficient set to 0.1, and learning rate was set to 10 −3 . A committee of neural networks is used for providing crop classification and land cover maps for Ukraine using high spatial resolution Landsat 8, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery (Skakun et al 2015;Kussul et al 2016;Kussul et al 2018;Ghazaryan et al 2018) and appropriate in-situ data for 2000, 2010, 2016 and 2017 (Shelestov et al 2017b;Skakun et al 2016;Waldner et al 2016). The spatial resolution of the resulting maps is 30 m for 2000 and 2010, and 10 m for 2016 and 2017 ( Figure 3).…”
Section: Workflow For Calculating Indicator 1531mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid overfitting, an L2 regularization was used with regularization coefficient set to 0.1, and learning rate was set to 10 −3 . A committee of neural networks is used for providing crop classification and land cover maps for Ukraine using high spatial resolution Landsat 8, Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery (Skakun et al 2015;Kussul et al 2016;Kussul et al 2018;Ghazaryan et al 2018) and appropriate in-situ data for 2000, 2010, 2016 and 2017 (Shelestov et al 2017b;Skakun et al 2016;Waldner et al 2016). The spatial resolution of the resulting maps is 30 m for 2000 and 2010, and 10 m for 2016 and 2017 ( Figure 3).…”
Section: Workflow For Calculating Indicator 1531mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Ghazaryan et al. ), describes important phenological traits that help discriminate different types of land management. Moreover, using NDVI data from MODIS, which has a stable temporal and spatial acquisition geometry, assured the consistency of our results across different study regions, making them comparable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of crops, their crop calendar, and the diversity of agronomic practices are details that are critical for the selection of the image-set and are quite familiar to the local inspectors of the PAs. In most studies, using all the available cloud-free images is recommended to account for all the varying agronomic practices which cause misclassifications [33,35,36]. Image pre-processing steps include the data subset to the area of interest, estimation of several radiometric indices, and image stack of the several satellite data and products.…”
Section: Crop Mapping Functionality Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step for the application of the DSS crop type mapping functionality is the Sentinel-2 image query. The selection of the optimal dates and number of images depends on the area of interest, the variety of crop types, and the spectral heterogeneity of the crop types [33,35,36]. Variation in the dates of planting or harvesting is a common source of error in the image classification processes [36].…”
Section: Crop Type Mapping-example Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%