2019
DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2019.1615481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A round-robin finite element analysis of human femur mechanics between seven participating laboratories with experimental validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation of the FEA model by the quasi-static experiment showed excellent correlation regarding the coefficients of determination. The experimentally measured values of the strain gauge strain and the displacement of point C in vertical direction were in the range of the magnitudes predicted by the FEA and are plausible concerning other studies [ 42 , 63 ]. In contrast to the strain, the deviation for the displacement between the numerical data and the experiment was not negligible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The validation of the FEA model by the quasi-static experiment showed excellent correlation regarding the coefficients of determination. The experimentally measured values of the strain gauge strain and the displacement of point C in vertical direction were in the range of the magnitudes predicted by the FEA and are plausible concerning other studies [ 42 , 63 ]. In contrast to the strain, the deviation for the displacement between the numerical data and the experiment was not negligible.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is probably due to the uncertainties in the evaluation of the local TMD values from in vivo microCT scans, which are affected by image artefacts, such as beam hardening, that propagate in the FE model in function of the assignment of the heterogeneous material properties through the chosen constitutive law. It is interesting to note that a similar consideration in a quite different study was concluded by Kluess et al (2019) when analysing the uncertainties in FE modelling approaches for the human femur by different laboratories. The model using the simplest definition for material properties (homogeneous) was among those that achieved more accurate results compared to more complex models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A human femur specimen of a 58 years male donor with no history of major injury or orthopaedic surgery was CT scanned (SOMATOM Definition AS + CT scanner, Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) with a calibration phantom (European Forearm Phantom-05–83, QRM GmbH, Möhrendorf, Germany) and the images were stored in DICOM format (Kluess et al 2019 ). AMIRA® software was deployed to import these images and reconstruct the bone surface.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%