2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A roughness model for the machining of biomedical ceramics by toric grinding pins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let E(t) be the ellipse resulting from the projection along P of the cutter centre-torus circle, and Redonnet et al (2013). This correct assumption in the case of machining by grinding tool like (Denkena et al 2010(Denkena et al , 2013, seems also to be correct in the case of milling at low feed rate. The notion of "low feed rate" remains largely subjective and in most cases it should be possible to use higher feed rate than it is for finishing operation due to the low depth of cut and thus low cutting forces- Tai and Fuh (1994).…”
Section: Analytical Model Of Scallop Height Context and Analytic Exprmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Let E(t) be the ellipse resulting from the projection along P of the cutter centre-torus circle, and Redonnet et al (2013). This correct assumption in the case of machining by grinding tool like (Denkena et al 2010(Denkena et al , 2013, seems also to be correct in the case of milling at low feed rate. The notion of "low feed rate" remains largely subjective and in most cases it should be possible to use higher feed rate than it is for finishing operation due to the low depth of cut and thus low cutting forces- Tai and Fuh (1994).…”
Section: Analytical Model Of Scallop Height Context and Analytic Exprmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To achieve a fine surface roughness needed for such applications, after cutting (e.g. milling, drilling) operations, specialised finishing processes need to be employed such as automated bonnet polishing [34,211], simultaneous 5-axis polishing with resilient tools [46,185], drag finishing, magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) [207], or magnetorheological fluid polishing [168].…”
Section: Cobalt-based Alloysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to a lead angle β f = 30° and a tilt angle β fN = 30° used in this investigation, the contact width b g is always larger for the frontal grinding strategy than for the lateral grinding strategy. The contact length l g is always smaller for the frontal grinding strategy than for the lateral strategy [12].…”
Section: Grinding With Toric Grinding Pinsmentioning
confidence: 90%