2010
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.519425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Rose by Any Other Name: Pain Contracts/Agreements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies using different methodologies have identified additional barriers to uptake of recommended opioid management practices, including inadequate physician knowledge, 25 ethical concerns, 24 and insufficient evidence for effectiveness of specific practices. 10,26 This study complements and extends our understanding of barriers to guidelineconcordant opioid management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies using different methodologies have identified additional barriers to uptake of recommended opioid management practices, including inadequate physician knowledge, 25 ethical concerns, 24 and insufficient evidence for effectiveness of specific practices. 10,26 This study complements and extends our understanding of barriers to guidelineconcordant opioid management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target article cites Robert Merton's work regarding unintended consequences, and it is instructive to note that the first two causes Merton enumerates apply quite well to my analysis; I am claiming precisely that (1) ignorance of the complexity of the policy problem and (2) error in the analysis of the problem are substantial weaknesses in the admittedly well-intentioned efforts to ameliorate the undertreatment of pain (Payne et al 2010). In my work on pain, I endeavor to apply a ruthless pragmatism, and to translate evidence related to the culture of pain into practical policy recommendations (Goldberg 2009a).…”
Section: Please Scroll Down For Articlementioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is worth noting that these practices are controversial, and not necessarily universally supported by regulatory or ethical argument (see e.g.,Payne et al 2010). The preceding argument is sound if these practices are ethically allowed; if they are not, then no argument which depends upon these exceptions being ethical, including the one being rebutted herein, can follow.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%