2020 International Conference Nonlinearity, Information and Robotics (NIR) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/nir50484.2020.9290190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A ROS-based swing up control and stabilization of the Pendubot using virtual holonomic constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This section provides simulation results of implementing control method (6) to the system in a form of (11), and moreover some preliminary experimental results. The aim of presented simulations is to check the performance of the controller applied for the stabilization of Pendubot in the upright equilibrium pose.…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This section provides simulation results of implementing control method (6) to the system in a form of (11), and moreover some preliminary experimental results. The aim of presented simulations is to check the performance of the controller applied for the stabilization of Pendubot in the upright equilibrium pose.…”
Section: Simulation and Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the control approach discussed in Section 3.1 does not guarantee stabilization of the closed-loop system at the chosen equilibrium the overall control strategy based on a hybrid approach (6) will be used. For this purpose, firstly a set of feasible initial conditions for which the controller (20) applied for system (11) brings the robot state near the equilibrium point should be obtained.…”
Section: Linear Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the purpose we consider in this paper, however, namely the design of a continuous (orbitally) stabilizing feedback controller for PtP motions with a known maneuver, one must of course also take into consideration the equilibria located at the boundaries of the motion. On the one hand, this directly excludes regular transverse coordinates-based methods such as [4,12,13], which would then require some form of control switching and/or orbit jumping à la [15,16]. On the other hand, the ideas proposed in regards to maneuver regulations in [1,5] can, as we will see, to some extent be modified as to also handle the equilibria, but suffers from other shortcomings: 1) the choice of projection operator is strictly determined by the tracking controller, thus excluding simpler operators, e.g., operators only depending on the configuration variables; while most importantly, 2) the restriction of constant feedback gains greatly limits its applicability to stabilize (not necessarily PtP) motions of both UMSs and nonlinear systems in general.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%