2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00179-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A role for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in lens epithelial differentiation

Abstract: The differentiation of epithelial cells and fiber cells from the anterior and posterior compartments of the lens vesicle, respectively, give the mammalian lens its distinctive polarity. While much progress has been made in understanding the molecular basis of fiber differentiation, little is known about factors that govern the differentiation of the epithelium. Members of the Wnt growth factor family appear to be key regulators of epithelial differentiation in various organ systems. Wnts are ligands for Frizzl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
130
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistently, even in the presence of Wnt inhibitors prospective lens cells in chick explants still upregulate the lens markers L-Maf and d-crystallin (Sjö dal and Gunhaga 2006, unpublished data). Finally, in mice, individual deletions of two Wnt co-receptors, Lrp5 and Lrp6 required for Wnt canonical signalling, do not perturb lens fate determination [64][65][66]. Although, a double knock-out of Lrp5 and Lrp6 would determine whether these co-receptors may act redundantly during early lens specification, it seems unlikely that such double mutants would exhibit a lens phenotype, since the above results clearly provide evidence that Wnt signals are not required for lens fate specification.…”
Section: Caudal Restriction Of Lens Cells By Wnt Activitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Consistently, even in the presence of Wnt inhibitors prospective lens cells in chick explants still upregulate the lens markers L-Maf and d-crystallin (Sjö dal and Gunhaga 2006, unpublished data). Finally, in mice, individual deletions of two Wnt co-receptors, Lrp5 and Lrp6 required for Wnt canonical signalling, do not perturb lens fate determination [64][65][66]. Although, a double knock-out of Lrp5 and Lrp6 would determine whether these co-receptors may act redundantly during early lens specification, it seems unlikely that such double mutants would exhibit a lens phenotype, since the above results clearly provide evidence that Wnt signals are not required for lens fate specification.…”
Section: Caudal Restriction Of Lens Cells By Wnt Activitymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For over 20 years, it was believed that fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) were the major regulators of lens fiber cell differentiation. However, recent data imply that the cooperative action of three different signaling pathways (FGF, BMP, and WNT) can control lens fiber cell differentiation, but the exact identity of the ligands remains unknown (BeleckyAdams et al, 2002;Stump et al, 2003;de Iongh et al, 2004;Lyu and Joo, 2004;Lovicu and McAvoy, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, mice lacking either of the Frizzled co-receptors (LRP5 or LRP6) demonstrated abnormal eye development. LRP6 knockout mice were microophthalmic and had severe defects in their retinal, lens, and corneal development (Gong et al, 2001;Stump et al, 2003;Jiao et al, 2004;Toomes et al, 2004). In LRP5 knockout mice, the hyaloid vasculature did not regress and was retained throughout the lifetime of the mice (Gong et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, truncating mutations in APC are thought to alleviate blockade of ␤-catenin͞LEF transcriptional activity, thus promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting cellular differentiation (5). Consistent with a potential role for APC in abnormal eye development, the WNT͞␤-catenin signaling cascade is critical for specification of lens tissue and regulation of lens growth and differentiation (6,7). WNT signaling also plays a role in various aspects of retinogenesis (8 -10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%