2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.12.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Role for GIBBERELLIN 2-OXIDASE6 and Gibberellins in Regulating Nectar Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Arabidopsis and Nicotiana spp. have been extensively studied as genetic models for nectar production (Bender et al., , ; Carter, Graham, & Thornburg, ; Carter, Shafir, Yehonatan, Palmer, & Thornburg, ; Carter & Thornburg, , , ,,; Carter et al., ; Hampton et al., ; Horner et al., ; Kram & Carter, ; Kram et al., ; Lin et al., ; Liu & Thornburg, ; Liu et al., ; Naqvi et al., ; Ren, Healy, Horner, et al., ; Ren, Healy, Klyne, et al., ; Roy et al., ; Ruhlmann et al., ; Stitz, Hartl, Baldwin, & Gaquerel, ; Thomas, Hampton, Dorn, Marks, & Carter, ; Thornburg et al., ; Wiesen et al., ), an expansion of molecular biology approaches into other systems with larger nectaries (Figure ) that produce copious amounts of nectar will aid our understanding of nectary biology, particularly with regard to quantitative biochemical, physiological, and comparative studies. Our study has revealed a plethora of squash genes and metabolic processes that are temporally regulated as the nectary progresses from pre‐secretion to secretion to post‐secretion stages of development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Arabidopsis and Nicotiana spp. have been extensively studied as genetic models for nectar production (Bender et al., , ; Carter, Graham, & Thornburg, ; Carter, Shafir, Yehonatan, Palmer, & Thornburg, ; Carter & Thornburg, , , ,,; Carter et al., ; Hampton et al., ; Horner et al., ; Kram & Carter, ; Kram et al., ; Lin et al., ; Liu & Thornburg, ; Liu et al., ; Naqvi et al., ; Ren, Healy, Horner, et al., ; Ren, Healy, Klyne, et al., ; Roy et al., ; Ruhlmann et al., ; Stitz, Hartl, Baldwin, & Gaquerel, ; Thomas, Hampton, Dorn, Marks, & Carter, ; Thornburg et al., ; Wiesen et al., ), an expansion of molecular biology approaches into other systems with larger nectaries (Figure ) that produce copious amounts of nectar will aid our understanding of nectary biology, particularly with regard to quantitative biochemical, physiological, and comparative studies. Our study has revealed a plethora of squash genes and metabolic processes that are temporally regulated as the nectary progresses from pre‐secretion to secretion to post‐secretion stages of development.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…To understand the nexus of genes and processes that are activated in C. pepo nectaries throughout maturation, we decided to take a transcriptomic strategy. This approach was previously used with Arabidopsis nectaries (Kram, Xu, & Carter, ) and led to the identification of key genes that regulate nectary function and nectar production [e.g., (Bender et al., , ; Kram & Carter, ; Lin et al., ; Ruhlmann et al., ; Schmitt, Roy, Klinkenberg, Jia, & Carter, ; Wiesen et al., )]. Squash nectaries are considerably larger than Arabidopsis (~1 cm diameter for squash vs. ~100 μm for Arabidopsis) and produce relatively large amounts of nectar (>50 μl for squash vs. ≪1 μl for Arabidopsis, per flower).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was previously used with Arabidopsis nectaries (Kram et al, 2009) and led to the identification of key genes that regulate nectary function and nectar production [e.g. (Kram and Carter, 2009; Ruhlmann et al, 2010; Bender et al, 2012; Bender et al, 2013; Lin et al, 2014; Wiesen et al, 2016; Schmitt et al, 2018)]. Squash nectaries are considerably larger than Arabidopsis (~1 cm diameter for squash vs. ~100 μM for Arabidopsis) and produce relatively large amounts of nectar (>50 μl for squash vs. <<1 μl for Arabidopsis, per flower).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we compared and contrasted the nectary morphologies, nectary transcriptomes, and nectar metabolomes of the floral, bracteal, circumbracteal, and foliar nectaries of cotton. These data build upon genetic models for nectar production developed primarily using floral nectaries of Arabidopsis and Nicotiana spp., which are nectary tissues containing modified stomata, referred to as ‘nectarostomata’ (Bender et al, 2012, 2013, Carter et al, 1999, 2006, 2007, Carter and Thornburg, 2000, 2004; Hampton et al, 2010; Kram and Carter, 2009; Lin et al, 2014; Liu and Thornburg, 2012; Ren et al, 2007; Ruhlmann et al, 2010; Thomas et al, 2017; Thornburg et al, 2003; Wiesen et al, 2016). Thus, this study evaluates the applicability of the nectar production model developed from studies of floral nectaries to extrafloral nectaries, and nectaries that are composed of secretory trichomes (papillae).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%