2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A rodent “self-report” measure of methamphetamine craving? Rat ultrasonic vocalizations during methamphetamine self-administration, extinction, and reinstatement

Abstract: Rats emit ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in a variety of contexts, and it is increasingly clear that USVs reflect more complex information than mere positive and negative affect states. We sought to examine USVs in a common model of addiction and relapse, the self-administration/reinstatement paradigm, in order to gain insight into subjective states experienced by rats during various types of methamphetamine seeking. We measured three subtypes of “50kHz” USVs [flats, trills, and non-trill frequency modulated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(134 reference statements)
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerable attention has been given to positive rewarding effects associated with MA addiction (Beckmann et al, 2010;Horton et al, 2011;Kamens et al, 2005;Mahler et al, 2013;Meyer et al, 2011;Mizoguchi et al, 2004;Shabani et al, 2011Shabani et al, , 2012aWheeler et al, 2009), whereas aversive effects that could limit intake have been given less consideration (Harrod et al, 2010;Pringle et al, 2008;Shabani et al, 2011Shabani et al, , 2012bWheeler et al, 2009). Greater Figure 3 (a) Methamphetamine (MA) consumption differs by Taar1 genotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable attention has been given to positive rewarding effects associated with MA addiction (Beckmann et al, 2010;Horton et al, 2011;Kamens et al, 2005;Mahler et al, 2013;Meyer et al, 2011;Mizoguchi et al, 2004;Shabani et al, 2011Shabani et al, , 2012aWheeler et al, 2009), whereas aversive effects that could limit intake have been given less consideration (Harrod et al, 2010;Pringle et al, 2008;Shabani et al, 2011Shabani et al, , 2012bWheeler et al, 2009). Greater Figure 3 (a) Methamphetamine (MA) consumption differs by Taar1 genotype.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with this hypothesis, in dependent rats but not nondependent rats, we observed that a subset of rats that displayed high alcoholin take also had higher levels of anticipatory 50 kHz USVs compared with low-alcohol-intake rats. Previous studies have reported an increase in 50 kHz USVs in response to cues paired with appetitive stimuli, such as food [8,9], copulation [10,11], and cocaine [11,12]. Rats that had extinguished methamphetamine self-administration and then given a methamphetamine priming injection or exposed to drug-paired cues robustly emitted 50 kHz USVs and rein-stated drug-seeking behavior [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have reported an increase in 50 kHz USVs in response to cues paired with appetitive stimuli, such as food [8,9], copulation [10,11], and cocaine [11,12]. Rats that had extinguished methamphetamine self-administration and then given a methamphetamine priming injection or exposed to drug-paired cues robustly emitted 50 kHz USVs and rein-stated drug-seeking behavior [12]. If these cue-induced USVs are thought to reflect an increased appetitive or motivational state, it may suggest that a subgroup of alcohol-dependent rats (i.e., the high drinkers) in the present study demonstrated an increase in motivational salience (i.e., an increase in alcohol-seeking behavior/craving/incentive salience), reflected by higher anticipatory50 kHz USVs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, USVs in the upper frequency range near 50 kHz predominate in positive contexts including mating, exploration, play, and also in the anticipation of rewards such as food and electrical stimulation (Bialy et al 2000; Burgdorf et al 2006; Knutson et al 1998; 1999). As a result, 50 kHz USVs have been proposed to be an index of affective state and further, as a preclinical analogue to human “self-report” of subjective states (Mahler et al 2013; Panksepp et al 2002). Given the potential motivational significance of these USVs, it is possible that they index an aspect of drug sensitivity distinct from locomotion, and may thus distinguish sign- and goal-trackers, especially after administration of addictive drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%