2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13640-015-0061-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust SVM classification framework using PSM for multi-class recognition

Abstract: Our research focuses on the question of classifiers that are capable of processing images rapidly and accurately without having to rely on a large-scale dataset, thus presenting a robust classification framework for both facial expression recognition (FER) and object recognition. The framework is based on support vector machines (SVMs) and employs three key approaches to enhance its robustness. First, it uses the perturbed subspace method (PSM) to extend the range of sample space for task sample training, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the proposed framework treats feature learning separately by dopting the subject-independent classifier to the final objective of classification. Since local features trained by classifiers can effectively cancel out the problems caused by semantic gap, which leads to an overall significant improvement of the classification performance [37][38][39]. Thus, the learned feature and classifier have specificity and discriminative capability.…”
Section: Recognition Results Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the proposed framework treats feature learning separately by dopting the subject-independent classifier to the final objective of classification. Since local features trained by classifiers can effectively cancel out the problems caused by semantic gap, which leads to an overall significant improvement of the classification performance [37][38][39]. Thus, the learned feature and classifier have specificity and discriminative capability.…”
Section: Recognition Results Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many studies have encouraged the use of subject-specific modeling to better utilize all the available information from multiple visual data [27,[39][40][41]59], it is important to properly analyze the strengths and weaknesses of different modeling approaches. The popularity of SVM in image classification can be explained by its ability to scale well with high dimensional data [131][132][133]. Although this works well when provided with small number of classes, increased number of classes with limited train data per class could complicate the process of finding the separation hyperplane.…”
Section: Study 3: Experimental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%