2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2959636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust STAP Method Based on Alternating Projection and Clutter Cancellation

Abstract: Space-time steering vector mismatch of targets usually happens in the space-time adaptive processing (STAP) technique, causing space-time beam distortion. Due to the effects of clutter spectrum broadening and jamming, performance of the conventional STAP method deteriorates dramatically. This paper proposes a novel robust STAP method to improve the performance of clutter suppression and moving target detection. The proposed method employs the alternating projection and clutter cancellation method, to reconstru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In airborne radar systems, space-time adaptive processing (STAP) is crucial for clutter suppression and moving target detection [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. However, the performance of the STAP algorithm is largely affected by the accuracy of clutter covariance matrix (CCM) estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In airborne radar systems, space-time adaptive processing (STAP) is crucial for clutter suppression and moving target detection [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. However, the performance of the STAP algorithm is largely affected by the accuracy of clutter covariance matrix (CCM) estimation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in actual clutter circumstances, significant heterogeneity emerges because of the inner movement of clutter, topographic variation, and some external factors. As a result, the IID relationship between training samples and CUT is not maintained [10]. This causes the number of IID samples to decrease rapidly, and the error of CCM estimation to increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%