2017
DOI: 10.3390/s17092087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Robust Sparse Representation Model for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Abstract: Sparse representation has been extensively investigated for hyperspectral image (HSI) classification and led to substantial improvements in the performance over the traditional methods, such as support vector machine (SVM). However, the existing sparsity-based classification methods typically assume Gaussian noise, neglecting the fact that HSIs are often corrupted by different types of noise in practice. In this paper, we develop a robust classification model that admits realistic mixed noise, which includes G… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HSIs not only record the spectrum of materials in the spectral domain but also capture the distribution of ground-objects in the spatial domain. As the distribution of ground materials typically shows some continuity, HSIs are composed of various nearly homogeneous regions made of pixels that belong to the same class with a very high probability [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. For this reason, spectral signatures of pixels within small local regions are typically very similar.…”
Section: The Ssc-tv Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HSIs not only record the spectrum of materials in the spectral domain but also capture the distribution of ground-objects in the spatial domain. As the distribution of ground materials typically shows some continuity, HSIs are composed of various nearly homogeneous regions made of pixels that belong to the same class with a very high probability [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. For this reason, spectral signatures of pixels within small local regions are typically very similar.…”
Section: The Ssc-tv Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the experimental results are assessed by the overall accuracy (OA), average accuracy (AA), and kappa statistics (k) [ 35 ]. In order to avoid the effects induced by the selection of training samples, ten independent Monte Karlo runs are performed and OA, AA, and k are all averaged by ten runs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It tends to produce solutions where the adjacent pixels are likely to belong to the same class [ 3 ]. The MLL prior has been widely used in image segmentation problems [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ] and is a generalization of the Ising model [ 35 , 36 , 37 ]. It can be formulated as: where is a tunable parameter controlling the degree of smoothness, Z is a normalization constant for the density, and is the unit impulse function.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the authors, this provides robustness against the noise and low data quality attributed to the atmospheric distortions, but no experimental evidence was reported in the paper. The concept of classifying the super-pixels was also explored by Huang et al, who exploited a sparse representation model to achieve robustness against the mixed noise [78]. Duan et al proposed to employ relative total variation (commonly used for noise reduction) to extract multi-scale structural features [79].…”
Section: Dealing With Low-quality Datamentioning
confidence: 99%