2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2020.113289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust penalty coupling of non-matching isogeometric Kirchhoff–Love shell patches in large deformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin by reordering the matrix A ∈ R ndof×ndof stemming from (26) in blocks as follows: where the subscripts i and refer to internal and interface dofs, respectively, where an example is depicted in Fig. 4.…”
Section: The Schur Complement Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We begin by reordering the matrix A ∈ R ndof×ndof stemming from (26) in blocks as follows: where the subscripts i and refer to internal and interface dofs, respectively, where an example is depicted in Fig. 4.…”
Section: The Schur Complement Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, penalty methods are widely used in the engineering community due to their conceptual simplicity, see the seminal work [2]. Furthermore, they can be easily and efficiently incorporated into a numerical code, where we refer to [1,13,16,23,26] for more insights and some applications in the context of isogeometric Kirchhoff-Love shells. Nonetheless, a major drawback of this approach resides in their lack of robustness with respect to the choice of penalty parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Integration points and weights are easily provided by the algorithm given in [5]. The proposed reduced integration rule is accurate and does not give stability problems [18]. However, this does not solve the convergence issue in large deformation problems for high values of the penalty parameter.…”
Section: Penalty Formulation With Reduced Integration and Mixed Integmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they are used to evaluate the tangent global stiffness matrix, making the performance of the iterative process almost unaffected by the penalty parameter α. As a consequence we can now use high values of α without compromising the iterative effort to gain equilibrium [18].…”
Section: Penalty Formulation With Reduced Integration and Mixed Integmentioning
confidence: 99%