2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.02.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A robust NMR method to measure porosity of low porosity rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty in the characterization of shale reservoirs is the quantitative description of micropore and mesopore structures. A variety of experiments have been used to study the pore structure, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [15][16][17], atomic force microscopy (AFM) [18,19], small-angle X-ray (SAXS) [20,21], small-angle/ultra-small-angle neutron scattering (SANS/USANS) [22][23][24][25][26], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [27][28][29][30], high-pressure mercury intrusion (HMIP) [31][32][33][34] and low-temperature liquid nitrogen/carbon dioxide adsorption (LP-N 2 /CO 2 GA) [23][24][25]31,35]. Among these, LP-N 2 /CO 2 GA analysis has been proven to be an effective method in characterizing the pore size distribution of micropores and mesopores [23][24][25]31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in the characterization of shale reservoirs is the quantitative description of micropore and mesopore structures. A variety of experiments have been used to study the pore structure, including scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [15][16][17], atomic force microscopy (AFM) [18,19], small-angle X-ray (SAXS) [20,21], small-angle/ultra-small-angle neutron scattering (SANS/USANS) [22][23][24][25][26], nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [27][28][29][30], high-pressure mercury intrusion (HMIP) [31][32][33][34] and low-temperature liquid nitrogen/carbon dioxide adsorption (LP-N 2 /CO 2 GA) [23][24][25]31,35]. Among these, LP-N 2 /CO 2 GA analysis has been proven to be an effective method in characterizing the pore size distribution of micropores and mesopores [23][24][25]31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,29,30 EGS reservoirs consist of the complex fracture network, propagation and fracture roughness 31 that were formed during the fracturing process. The morphology of the fracture void 32 and the matrix pores 33 influence the flow behavior and inaccurate prediction of the CO 2 sequestration. Using THM coupled model and multi-fracture discrete network, Shi et al 34,35 performed numerical simulation in an EGS using CO 2 as a circulating fluid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of shale matrix, organic matter characteristics i.e. type, richness and maturity, structure of pores, pressure, temperature and water content are the main controlling factors that affect the physics and laws in shale gas storage [28][29]. The mechanism of shale gas storage changes due to these controlling factors and resulted behavior of free, adsorbed and absorbed gas (total gas storage) is altered.…”
Section: Mechanism and Parameters For Shale Gip Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adsorbed and absorbed gas contributes in term of total gas storage about 20-80% [11] and 22% [12], respectively. The absorbed gas remains associated with adsorbed gas but previous studies underestimated such gas in predicting the gas sorption and production behavior [13][14][15][16]; However, it is broadly recognized as gas dissolved into organic matter but has not yet attracted enough attention [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%